Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689331›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2024

Impact of including productivity costs in economic analyses of vaccines for C. difficile infections and infant respiratory syncytial virus, in a UK setting.

Margherita Neri, Janne C Mewes, Fernando Albuquerque de Almeida, Sophia Stoychev, Nadia Minarovic, Apostolos Charos, Kimberly M Shea, Lotte M G Steuten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Margherita NeriOffice of Health Economics (OHE), London, UK.
Janne C MewesPanaxea b.v, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fernando Albuquerque de AlmeidaPfizer Inc, New York, USA.
Sophia StoychevPfizer Inc, New York, USA.
Nadia MinarovicPfizer Inc, New York, USA.
Apostolos CharosPfizer Inc, New York, USA.
Kimberly M Shea *Pfizer Inc, New York, USA.
Lotte M G Steuten *Office of Health Economics (OHE), London, UK. LSteuten@ohe.org.

Funding

Pfizer Inc, United States na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIt has been estimated that vaccines can accrue a relatively large part of their value from patient and carer productivity. Yet, productivity value is not commonly or consistently considered in health economic evaluations of vaccines in several high-income countries. To contribute to a better understanding of the potential impact of including productivity value on the expected cost-effectiveness of vaccination, we illustrate the extent to which the incremental costs would change with and without productivity value incorporated.

methodsFor two vaccines currently under development, one against Cloistridioides difficile (C. difficile) infection and one against respiratory syncytial disease (RSV), we estimated their incremental costs with and without productivity value included and compared the results.

resultsIn this analysis, reflecting a UK context, a C. difficile vaccination programme would prevent £12.3 in productivity costs for every person vaccinated. An RSV vaccination programme would prevent £49 in productivity costs for every vaccinated person.

conclusionsConsidering productivity costs in future cost-effectiveness analyses of vaccines for C. difficile and RSV will contribute to better-informed reimbursement decisions from a societal perspective.

Indexed as

C. difficile infectionEconomic evaluationProductivity lossesRespiratory syncytial virusVaccine

Identifiers

PMID38689331
PMCPMC11059668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.