Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689242›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2024

Cancer diagnosis after emergency presentations in people with mental health and substance use conditions: a national cohort study.

Ruth Cunningham, James Stanley, Fiona Imlach, Tracy Haitana, Helen Lockett, Susanna Every-Palmer, Mau Te Rangimarie Clark, Cameron Lacey, Kendra Telfer, Debbie Peterson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruth CunninghamUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
James StanleyUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Fiona ImlachUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Tracy HaitanaUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Helen LockettUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Susanna Every-PalmerUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Mau Te Rangimarie ClarkUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Cameron LaceyUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Kendra TelferUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Debbie PetersonUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand 20-216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer survival and mortality outcomes for people with mental health and substance use conditions (MHSUC) are worse than for people without MHSUC, which may be partly explained by poorer access to timely and appropriate healthcare, from screening and diagnosis through to treatment and follow-up. Access and quality of healthcare can be evaluated by comparing the proportion of people who receive a cancer diagnosis following an acute or emergency hospital admission (emergency presentation) across different population groups: those diagnosed with cancer following an emergency presentation have lower survival.

methodsNational mental health service use datasets (2002-2018) were linked to national cancer registry and hospitalisation data (2006-2018), to create a study population of people aged 15 years and older with one of four cancer diagnoses: lung, prostate, breast and colorectal. The exposure group included people with a history of mental health/addiction service contact within the five years before cancer diagnosis, with a subgroup of people with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or psychotic disorders. Marginal standardised rates were used to compare emergency presentations (hospital admission within 30 days of cancer diagnosis) in the exposure and comparison groups, adjusted for age, gender (for lung and colorectal cancers), ethnicity, area deprivation and stage at diagnosis.

resultsFor all four cancers, the rates of emergency presentation in the fully adjusted models were significantly higher in people with a history of mental health/addiction service use than people without (lung cancer, RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.13, 1.24; prostate cancer RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.44, 1.93; breast cancer RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14, 1.69; colorectal cancer 1.31, 95% CI 1.22, 1.39). Rates were substantially higher in those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or psychotic disorders.

conclusionsImplementing pathways for earlier detection and diagnosis of cancers in people with MHSUC could reduce the rates of emergency presentation, with improved cancer survival outcomes. All health services, including cancer screening programmes, primary and secondary care, have a responsibility to ensure equitable access to healthcare for people with MHSUC.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersNeoplasmsSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedBipolar DisorderCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMental HealthBreast neoplasmsCancerColorectal neoplasmsDiagnostic overshadowingEmergency presentationHealth care accessHealth disparitiesLung neoplasmsMental health and substance use disordersProstate neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38689242
PMCPMC11062004
OpenAlexW4396559149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.