ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2024
Contextual facilitation: Separable roles of contextual guidance and context suppression in visual search.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sense of agency modulates contextual learning in visual search.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Position-invariant icon remapping facilities search performance in foldable smartphones through the contribution of contextual cueing.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
- Withstand Context: Standing Posture Improves Contextual Cueing in Challenging Visual Search.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Statistical Context Learning in Visual Search: Distinct Electrophysiological Signatures of Contextual Guidance and Context Suppression.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Effect of cue validity on the contextual cueing effect.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual search is facilitated when targets are repeatedly encountered at a fixed position relative to an invariant distractor layout, compared to random distractor arrangements. However, standard investigations of this contextual-facilitation effect employ fixed distractor layouts that predict a constant target location, which does not always reflect real-world situations where the target location may vary relative to an invariant distractor arrangement. To explore the mechanisms involved in contextual learning, we employed a training-test procedure, introducing not only the standard full-repeated displays with fixed target-distractor locations but also distractor-repeated displays in which the distractor arrangement remained unchanged but the target locations varied. During the training phase, participants encountered three types of display: full-repeated, distractor-repeated, and random arrangements. The results revealed full-repeated displays to engender larger performance gains than distractor-repeated displays, relative to the random-display baseline. In the test phase, the gains were substantially reduced when full-repeated displays changed into distractor-repeated displays, while the transition from distractor-repeated to full-repeated displays failed to yield additional gains. We take this pattern to indicate that contextual learning can improve performance with both predictive and non-predictive (repeated) contexts, employing distinct mechanisms: contextual guidance and context suppression, respectively. We consider how these mechanisms might be implemented (neuro-)computationally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.