Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689130›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine - open2024

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) Scores over Time After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Timothy C Sell, Ryan Zerega, Victoria King, Charles R Reiter, Hailey Wrona, Garrett S Bullock, Nilani Mills, Anu Räisänen, Leila Ledbetter, Gary S Collins and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine - open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Timothy C SellAtrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Ryan ZeregaAtrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Victoria KingAtrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Charles R ReiterAtrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Hailey WronaAtrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Garrett S BullockDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Nilani MillsUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anu RäisänenDepartment of Physical Therapy Education-Oregon, College of Health Sciences-Northwest, Western University of Health Sciences, Oregon, USA.
Leila LedbetterMedical Libraries, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Gary S CollinsCentre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Joanna KvistUnit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Medicine, University of Linkoping, Linköping, Sweden.
Stephanie R FilbayDepartment of Physiotherapy, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Justin M LoscialeDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. jlosciale8@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5135-1191
Duke Medical Center · USLinköping University · SENuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GBOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Oxford · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological readiness is an important consideration for athletes and clinicians when making return to sport decisions following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). To improve our understanding of the extent of deficits in psychological readiness, a systematic review is necessary.

objectiveTo investigate psychological readiness (measured via the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL-RSI)) over time after ACL tear and understand if time between injury and surgery, age, and sex are associated with ACL-RSI scores.

methodsSeven databases were searched from the earliest date available to March 22, 2022. Articles reporting ACL-RSI scores after ACL tear were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I, RoB-2, and RoBANS tools based on the study design. Evidence certainty was assessed for each analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses pooled ACL-RSI scores, stratified by time post-injury and based on treatment approach (i.e., early ACLR, delayed ACLR, and unclear approach).

resultsA total of 83 studies were included in this review (78% high risk of bias). Evidence certainty was 'weak' or 'limited' for all analyses. Overall, ACL-RSI scores were higher at 3 to 6 months post-ACLR (mean = 61.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 58.6, 64.4], I

conclusionPsychological readiness to return to sport appears to improve early after ACL injury, with little subsequent improvement until ≥ 2-years after ACLR. Longer time from injury to surgery, female sex and older age might be negatively related to ACL-RSI scores 12-24 months after ACLR. Due to the weak evidence quality rating and the considerable importance of psychological readiness for long-term outcomes after ACL injury, there is an urgent need for well-designed studies that maximize internal validity and identify additional prognostic factors for psychological readiness at times critical for return to sport decisions. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (OSF), https://osf.io/2tezs/ .

Indexed as

AthletesKneePsychological readinessReturn to sport

Identifiers

PMID38689130
PMCPMC11061071
OpenAlexW4396558289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.