ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024
Long-term oncologic outcomes of unselected triple-negative breast cancer patients according to BRCA1/2 mutations.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Phase II Pilot Study of Anti-PD-L1, Durvalumab, and a PARP Inhibitor, Olaparib in Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer With or Without Germline BRCA Mutation.Cancer medicine · 2025Trial
- BRCA pathogenic variants and response in early TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab: outcomes of the BRCAPATH study.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Next-generation sequencing-based characterization of BRCA1/2 variants across multiple tumor types in Vietnamese patients.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation Prevalence in Unselected ER-Low/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Serum Protein Signatures for Breast Cancer Detection in Treatment-Naïve African American Women Using Integrated Proteomics and Pattern Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development of predictive models for the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer using multiple transcriptomic analyses.PloS one · 2026Article
- Synchronous primary breast invasive carcinoma and breast metastasis from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical predictors ofFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- A review of the use of tumour DNA methylation for breast cancer subtyping and prediction of outcomes.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Review
- ANP32E drives vulnerability to ATR inhibitors by inducing R-loops-dependent transcription replication conflicts in triple negative breast cancer.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Clinical Significance of Tumor Grade in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Article
- The impact of pathogenicSAGE open medicine · 2024Article
- Timing ofCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients are more likely to have BRCA1/2 mutations, with a prevalence rate of about 10-20%. Although several studies have analyzed the oncologic outcomes between BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers, the impact on breast cancer patients is still unclear. A retrospective review was performed to determine the long-term outcomes of TNBC patients, focusing on the impact of BRCA1/2 mutations. A total of 953 TNBC patients who underwent primary breast cancer surgery from June 2008 to January 2016 were included. We examined long-term outcomes, including contralateral breast cancer (CBC) incidence, recurrence patterns, and survival rates over a median follow-up of 80.9 months (range 3-152 months). 122 patients (12.8%) had BRCA1/2 mutations. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were significantly younger at diagnosis and more likely to have a family history of breast/ovarian cancer. CBC incidence at 60, 120, and 150 months was significantly higher in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers compared to non-carriers (P = 0.0250, 0.0063, and 0.0184, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in disease-free survival, overall survival, breast cancer-specific survival, or distant-metastasis-free survival between the two groups. BRCA1/2 mutation status was a significant risk factor for CBC (HR = 6.242, P < 0.0001). Interestingly, among 29 patients with CBC recurrence, 24 patients (82.8%) had recurring TNBC subtype and among the CBC recurrence patients, 19 patients (65.5%) resumed chemotherapy. In the TNBC subtype, appropriate genetic testing and counseling are pivotal for surgical decisions like risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM). Furthermore, long-term surveillance is warranted, especially in BRCA1/2 carriers who did not receive RRM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.