Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689040›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2024

The effects of static and dynamic stretching on deep fascia stiffness: a randomized, controlled cross-over study.

Konstantin Warneke, Thomas Rabitsch, Patrik Dobert, Jan Wilke

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Exploring fascia in myofascial pain syndrome: an integrative model of mechanisms.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Konstantin WarnekeInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, University of Graz, 8020, Graz, Austria. Konstantin.Warneke@uni-graz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-2867
Thomas RabitschInstitute of Sport Science, Alpen-Adria University Klagenfurt, 9020, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.
Patrik DobertInstitute of Sport Science, Alpen-Adria University Klagenfurt, 9020, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.
Jan WilkeInstitute of Sport Science, Alpen-Adria University Klagenfurt, 9020, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPrevious stretching studies mostly investigated effects on the skeletal muscle but comprehensive explorations regarding the role of the connective tissue are scarce. Since the deep fascia has been demonstrated to be sensitive to mechanical tension, it was hypothesized that the fascia would also respond to stretching, contributing to enhanced range of motion (ROM).

methodsForty (40) recreationally active participants (male: n = 25, female: n = 15) were included in the randomized controlled cross-over trial and allocated to different groups performing 5 min static (STAT) or dynamic (DYN) plantar flexor stretching or control condition (CC) in a random order. Pre- and immediately post-intervention, muscle and fascia stiffness, as well as muscle and fascia thickness were measured using high-resolution ultrasound and strain elastography. ROM was assessed in the ankle joint via the knee to wall test (KtW) and goniometer.

resultsSTAT reduced both, muscle and fascia stiffness (d = 0.78 and 0.42, p < 0.001, respectively), while DYN did not reduce stiffness compared to the control condition (p = 0.11-0.41). While both conditions showed significant increases in the KtW (d = 0.43-0.46, p = 0.02-0.04), no significant differences to the CC were observed for the isolated ROM testing (p = 0.09 and 0.77). There was a small correlation between fascia stiffness decreases and ROM increases (r = - 0.25, p = 0.006) but no association was found between muscle stiffness decreases and ROM increases (p = 0.13-0.40).

conclusionOur study is the first to reveal stretch-induced changes in fascia stiffness. Changes of fascia`s but not muscle`s mechanical properties may contribute to increased ROM following stretching.

Indexed as

FasciaMuscle, SkeletalMuscle Stretching ExercisesRange of Motion, ArticularAdultAnkle JointCross-Over StudiesElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultConnective tissueFascial propertiesFlexibilityRange of motion

Identifiers

PMID38689040
PMCPMC11365840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.