Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689038›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2025

Real-world experience with filgotinib for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany : A retrospective chart review.

Olaf Schultz, Christoph Fiehn, Christian Kneitz, Nils Picker, Daniel Kromer, Monia Zignani, Francesco De Leonardis, Hans-Dieter Orzechowski, Margot Gurrath, Klaus Krüger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olaf SchultzACURA Kliniken Baden-Baden/Rheumazentrum, Rotenbachtalstraße 5, 76530, Baden-Baden, Germany. O.Schultz@acura-kliniken.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4310-8854
Christoph FiehnPraxis for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Center Baden-Baden, Baden-Baden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9665-1526
Christian KneitzRheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Schwerin, Schwerin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6859-9043
Nils PickerIngress-Health HWM GmbH-A Cytel Company, Wismar, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5328-4332
Daniel KromerIngress-Health HWM GmbH-A Cytel Company, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0770-6247
Monia ZignaniGalapagos GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9210-8087
Francesco De LeonardisGalapagos GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3247-4462
Hans-Dieter OrzechowskiGalapagos Biopharma Germany GmbH, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7374-6899
Margot GurrathGalapagos Biopharma Germany GmbH, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2334-7618
Klaus KrügerRheumatologisches Praxiszentrum St. Bonifatius, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReal-world data for filgotinib, a Janus kinase (JAK)1 inhibitor, are limited in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

objectivesTo explore real-world filgotinib use in patients with RA in Germany. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective chart review included patients aged ≥ 18 years with confirmed moderate to severe RA who initiated filgotinib before December 1, 2021, with ≥ 6 months of medical records available prior to filgotinib initiation or after initial diagnosis. Patient characteristics, prior treatments, reasons for initiating/discontinuing filgotinib, disease activity, dose adjustments and concomitant treatments were recorded.

resultsIn total, 301 patients from 20 German rheumatology outpatient units were included. One-third were aged ≥ 65 years and almost half had ≥ 1 cardiovascular (CV) risk factor. Most patients initiated filgotinib as monotherapy (83.7%; 12.7% of whom with glucocorticoids) and at the 200 mg dose (84.7%); higher proportions of those initiating the 100 versus 200 mg dose were aged ≥ 65 years and had renal impairment or ≥ 1 CV risk factor. Oral administration (78.4%), fast onset of action (66.8%) and administration as monotherapy (65.4%) were the most common reasons for initiating filgotinib. At 12 months, 41 (18.4%) patients had discontinued filgotinib, most commonly due to lack of effectiveness. After 6‑months of follow-up, 36.8% of patients had achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission and 45.6% had achieved CDAI low disease activity.

conclusionsIn clinical practice in Germany, reasons for initiating filgotinib in patients with RA were related to dosing flexibility and general JAK inhibitor attributes. Filgotinib was used predominantly as monotherapy and was effective and generally well tolerated; however, longer-term data in larger, prospective cohorts are needed.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidPyridinesTriazolesAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsGLPG0634PyridinesTriazolesClinical trialsJanus kinase 1 inhibitorsRetrospective studiesRheumaticTherapeutic rationale

Identifiers

PMID38689038
PMCPMC11779788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.