Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38689034›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2024

Surgical management of complex curvature in Peyronie's disease.

Ateş Kadıoğlu, Mehmet Gürcan, Abdurakhmonov Farkod Rakhmonovich, Murat Dursun

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07470528 (Comparative Outcomes of Subtunical Microdissection and Grafting Versus Classical Plaque Incision and Grafting in Complex Peyronie's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07470528 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Outcomes of Subtunical Microdissection and Grafting Versus Classical Plaque Incision and Grafting in Complex Peyronie's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorNamik Kemal UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsPeyronie's Disease (PD)ArmsSubtunical microdissection and grafting, Classic plaque Incision and Grafting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ateş KadıoğluFaculty of Medicine, Section of Andrology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University, Millet Cad. Istanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Monoblok, Kat:1, Fatih, 34104, Istanbul, Turkey. drkadiogluates@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4239-7638
Mehmet GürcanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abdurakhmonov Farkod RakhmonovichDepartment of Urology, Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan.
Murat DursunFaculty of Medicine, Section of Andrology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University, Millet Cad. Istanbul Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Monoblok, Kat:1, Fatih, 34104, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TRSamarkand State Medical Institute · UZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAbout 10% of Peyronie's patients are complex cases with severe curvature (>60 degrees), ventral plaque, multiplanar curvature, hour-glass/hinge deformity, notching deformity, and ossified plaque. In patients with complex Peyronie's disease (PD), different techniques (shortening procedures, lengthening procedures, and penile prosthesis implantation (IPP)) may be necessary to achieve successful result. This review aims to analyze the various surgical techniques employed in the management of Peyronie's disease, with a specific focus on patients with complex deformity.

methodsArticles focusing on the surgical management of complex curvature in Peyronie's disease were searched in MEDLINE and PubMed published between 1990 and 2023.

resultsShortening procedures are linked to penile shortening and are not recommended for complex cases such as notching, hour-glass deformity, or ossified plaque. Lengthening procedures are suitable for addressing complex curvatures without erectile dysfunction (ED) and are a more appropriate method for multiplanar curvatures. Penile prosthesis implantation (IPP), with or without additional procedures, is the gold standard for patients with ED and Peyronie's disease. IPP should also be the preferred option for cases of penile instability (hinge deformity) and has shown high satisfaction rates in all complex cases.

conclusionWhile surgical interventions for complex curvature in Peyronie's disease carry inherent risks, careful patient selection, meticulous surgical techniques, and post-operative care can help minimize complications and maximize positive outcome.

Indexed as

Penile ImplantationPenile IndurationUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleHumansMalePenile ProsthesisPenisComplex curvaturePenil prosthesisPeyronie’s diseasePlicationSevere curvature

Identifiers

PMID38689034
PMCPMC11061042
OpenAlexW4396559127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.