ArticleScientific reports2024
Circadian rhythm and surface activity in soil-dwelling caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona).
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Caecilians maintain a functional long-wavelength-sensitive cone opsin gene despite signatures of relaxed selection and more than 200 million years of fossoriality.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025Article
- Amphibians as a source of bioactive antioxidant peptides: Emerging insights and therapeutic potential.Zoological research · 2025Review
- Caecilians maintain a functional long-wavelength-sensitive cone opsin gene despite signatures of relaxed selection and more than 200 million years of fossoriality.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Circadian Rhythm of Body Color Change in the Juvenile Chinese Giant Salamander (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The degree to which burrowing, soil-dwelling caecilian amphibians spend time on the surface is little studied, and circadian rhythm has not been investigated in multiple species of this order or by manipulating light-dark cycles. We studied surface-activity rhythm of the Indian caecilians Ichthyophis cf. longicephalus and Uraeotyphlus cf. oxyurus (Ichthyophiidae) and Gegeneophis tejaswini (Grandisoniidae), under LD, DD and DL cycles. We examined daily surface activity and the role of light-dark cycles as a zeitgeber. All three species were strictly nocturnal and G. tejaswini displayed the least surface activity. Four out of thirteen individuals, two I. cf. longicephalus, one G. tejaswini and one U. cf. oxyurus, displayed a more or less distinct surface-activity rhythm in all three cycles, and for the nine other animals the activity patterns were not evident. An approximately 24 h free-run period was observed in the three species. When the light-dark cycle was inverted, surface activity in the three species shifted to the dark phase. The findings of this study suggest that caecilians have a weak circadian surface-activity rhythm, and that the absence of light can act as a prominent zeitgeber in these burrowing, limbless amphibians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.