Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38688941›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Circadian rhythm and surface activity in soil-dwelling caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona).

Avanthika Prakash, David J Gower, Ranjith Vengot, Ramachandran Kotharambath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Avanthika PrakashDepartment of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Tejaswini Hills, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
David J GowerDepartment of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Tejaswini Hills, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Ranjith VengotDepartment of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Tejaswini Hills, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.
Ramachandran KotharambathDepartment of Zoology, Central University of Kerala, Tejaswini Hills, Kasaragod, Kerala, India. ram@cukerala.ac.in.

Funding

Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) Ref No. 18/06/2017(i)EU-VDST | Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) No. VJR/2019/000044University Grants Commission (University Grants Commission India) UGC Ref. No. 2823/(CSIR-UGC NET DEC 2018)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The degree to which burrowing, soil-dwelling caecilian amphibians spend time on the surface is little studied, and circadian rhythm has not been investigated in multiple species of this order or by manipulating light-dark cycles. We studied surface-activity rhythm of the Indian caecilians Ichthyophis cf. longicephalus and Uraeotyphlus cf. oxyurus (Ichthyophiidae) and Gegeneophis tejaswini (Grandisoniidae), under LD, DD and DL cycles. We examined daily surface activity and the role of light-dark cycles as a zeitgeber. All three species were strictly nocturnal and G. tejaswini displayed the least surface activity. Four out of thirteen individuals, two I. cf. longicephalus, one G. tejaswini and one U. cf. oxyurus, displayed a more or less distinct surface-activity rhythm in all three cycles, and for the nine other animals the activity patterns were not evident. An approximately 24 h free-run period was observed in the three species. When the light-dark cycle was inverted, surface activity in the three species shifted to the dark phase. The findings of this study suggest that caecilians have a weak circadian surface-activity rhythm, and that the absence of light can act as a prominent zeitgeber in these burrowing, limbless amphibians.

Indexed as

AmphibiansCircadian RhythmSoilAnimalsBehavior, AnimalPhotoperiodSoil

Identifiers

PMID38688941
PMCPMC11061191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.