Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38688766›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology oncology2025

Patient-reported Quality of Life and Survival Outcomes in Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the ECOG-ACRIN E3805 Chemohormonal Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial (CHAARTED).

Daniel Sentana-Lledo, Xiangying Chu, David F Jarrard, Michael A Carducci, Robert S DiPaola, Lynn I Wagner, David Cella, Christopher J Sweeney, Alicia K Morgans

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel Sentana-LledoBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: dsentana@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Xiangying ChuDana Farber Cancer Institute - ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA, USA.
David F JarrardUniversity of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
Michael A CarducciJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Robert S DiPaolaUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Lynn I WagnerUniversity of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
David CellaNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christopher J SweeneySouth Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Alicia K MorgansDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

ECOG-ACRIN NCORP Research Base - TMISTUG1CA189828 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$199.7M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareU10CA180867 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD JOHN, KIBEL, ADAM S · 2014 to 2018
$6.2M
National Clinical Trials Network Research at the University of WisconsinUG1CA233277 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Lisa M Barroilhet, Andrew M. Baschnagel · 2019 to 2026
$4.9M
Johns Hopkins University NCTN Lead Academic Site ProgramU10CA180802 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARMSTRONG, DEBORAH K, BRAHMER, JULIE RENEE · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
National Clinical Trials Network Research at the University of WisconsinU10CA180799 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ANDERSON, BETHANY M, KUSHNER, DAVID M · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
Vanderbilt Network Lead Academic Participating Site for the NCTNU10CA180847 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERLIN, JORDAN D · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Building upon a tradition of excellence. The NCTN at Indiana UniversityU10CA180795 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MILLER, KATHY D. · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180795NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180799NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180802NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180847NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180867NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189828NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChemohormonal therapy with androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel (ADT + D) improves overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QOL) at 12 mo versus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the prognostic role of QOL is unknown in this population.

objectiveTo study the relationship between QOL, disease characteristics, and OS in men with mHSPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsIn this exploratory post hoc analysis, 790 patients with mHSPC completed the QOL instruments Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), and Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models tested the association between QOL and OS by clinical and disease characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Baseline higher FACT-P trended toward improved survival after accounting for clinical variables (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80 [0.62, 1.04], p = 0.09), while higher 3-mo FACT-P was independently associated with better survival (HR 0.76 [0.58, 1.0], p = 0.05). Patients with the poorest QOL (bottom quartile) at baseline and 3 mo had longer survival if they received ADT + D rather than ADT alone (median OS 45.2 vs 34.4 mo, HR 0.75 [0.53, 1.05], p = 0.09, and 48.3 vs 29.3 mo, HR 0.69 [0.48, 0.99], p = 0.05 respectively). In contrast, patients with the best QOL (top quartile) at baseline and 3 mo had comparable survival irrespective of whether or not docetaxel was added (median OS 72.1 vs 51.7 mo, HR 0.92 [0.63, 1.36], p = 0.69, and 69.9 vs 68.9 mo, HR 1.11 [0.73, 1.67], p = 0.63, respectively). Survival was linked with baseline FACIT-F (HR 0.76 [0.57, 1.0], p = 0.05), but not BPI (HR 0.98 [0.75, 1.28], p = 0.90).

conclusionsThree-month QOL had a stronger independent association with survival. The most symptomatic patients had longer survival with the addition of docetaxel; conversely, the least symptomatic patients did not appear to benefit. Consideration of QOL may enhance decision-making and patient selection when choosing chemohormonal treatment in mHSPC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Quality of life independently forecasted the survival of men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in the CHAARTED study. Close tracking of quality of life could help patients and clinicians make decisions about the appropriate treatment in this setting.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAgedDocetaxelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTaxoidsTreatment OutcomeAndrogen AntagonistsDocetaxelTaxoidsChemohormonalFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—ProstateMetastatic prostate cancerPatient-reported outcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38688766
PMCPMC11518880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.