Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38688719›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Comparative Anatomy of the Dentate Mossy Cells in Nonhuman Primates: Their Spatial Distributions and Axonal Projections Compared With Mouse Mossy Cells.

Minseok Jeong, Jinyoung Won, Kyung Seob Lim, Chang-Yeop Jeon, Youngshik Choe, Jin-Hyeok Jang, Chang Man Ha, Jong Hyuk Yoon, Yongjeon Lee, Yong-Seok Oh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Minseok JeongDepartment of Brain Sciences, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Republic of Korea.
Jinyoung WonNational Primate Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Cheongju 28116, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Seob LimFuturistic Animal Resource and Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Cheongju 28116, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Yeop JeonNational Primate Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Cheongju 28116, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8229-7068
Youngshik ChoeDevelopmental Disorders & Rare Diseases Research Group, Korea Brain Research Institute (KBRI), Daegu 41062, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Hyeok JangDepartment of Brain Sciences, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Republic of Korea.
Chang Man HaResearch Division and Brain Research Core Facilities, Korea Brain Research Institute (KBRI), Daegu 41062, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hyuk YoonNeurodegenerative Diseases Research Group, Korea Brain Research Institute (KBRI), Daegu 41062, Republic of Korea.
Yongjeon LeeNational Primate Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), Cheongju 28116, Republic of Korea neurosci@kribb.re.kr ysoh2040@dgist.ac.kr.
Yong-Seok OhDepartment of Brain Sciences, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Republic of Korea neurosci@kribb.re.kr ysoh2040@dgist.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutamatergic mossy cells (MCs) mediate associational and commissural connectivity, exhibiting significant heterogeneity along the septotemporal axis of the mouse dentate gyrus (DG). However, it remains unclear whether the neuronal features of MCs are conserved across mammals. This study compares the neuroanatomy of MCs in the DG of mice and monkeys. The MC marker, calretinin, distinguishes two subpopulations: septal and temporal. Dual-colored fluorescence labeling is utilized to compare the axonal projection patterns of these subpopulations. In both mice and monkeys, septal and temporal MCs project axons across the longitudinal axis of the ipsilateral DG, indicating conserved associational projections. However, unlike in mice, no MC subpopulations in monkeys make commissural projections to the contralateral DG. In monkeys, temporal MCs send associational fibers exclusively to the inner molecular layer, while septal MCs give rise to wide axonal projections spanning multiple molecular layers, akin to equivalent MC subpopulations in mice. Despite conserved septotemporal heterogeneity, interspecies differences are observed in the topological organization of septal MCs, particularly in the relative axonal density in each molecular layer along the septotemporal axis of the DG. In summary, this comparative analysis sheds light on both conserved and divergent features of MCs in the DG of mice and monkeys. These findings have implications for understanding functional differentiation along the septotemporal axis of the DG and contribute to our knowledge of the anatomical evolution of the DG circuit in mammals.

Indexed as

AxonsCalbindin 2Dentate GyrusMice, Inbred C57BLAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMossy Fibers, HippocampalSpecies SpecificityCalbindin 2associational projectionscommissural projectionsdentate gyrusheterogeneityhippocampusmossy cells

Identifiers

PMID38688719
PMCPMC11151194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.