Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38688655›Full record

Trial reportIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Patient-reported Outcome Measure (PROM) Rand-36-item Health Survey for Gallstone Disease Patients Five Years Following Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Anni Repo, Maaret Eskelinen, Iina Saimanen, Tuomas Selander, Jari Kärkkäinen, Petri Juvonen, Samuli Aspinen, Jukka Pulkkinen, Matti Eskelinen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anni Repo *Department of Surgery, and Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland.
Maaret Eskelinen *Department of Surgery, and Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland.
Iina Saimanen *Department of Surgery, and Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland.
Tuomas SelanderScience Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland.
Jari KärkkäinenDepartment of Surgery, and Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland.
Petri JuvonenDepartment of Surgery, and Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland.
Samuli AspinenDepartment of Surgery, and Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland.
Jukka PulkkinenDepartment of Surgery, and Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland.
Matti EskelinenDepartment of Surgery, and Science Service Center, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland matti.eskelinen@kuh.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThere are no studies assessing the long-term quality of life (QoL) following three-dimensional laparoscopy cholecystectomy (3D-LC) in patients with cholelithiasis (Chole). PATIENTS AND

methodsA cohort of 200 patients with Chole were randomized into 3D-LC or minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) groups. RAND-36 survey was performed before randomization, four weeks and five years postoperatively.

resultsSimilar postoperative five years RAND-36 scores were reported in the 3D-LC and MC groups. The MC and 3D-LC groups combined analysis, social functioning (SF, p=0.007), mental health (MH, p=0.001), role physical (RP, p<0.001) and bodily pain (BP, p<0.001) domains increased significantly. In comparison to the Finnish reference RAND-36 (FRR) scores, the scores at five years increased significantly in the MH domain, while four RAND-36 domains; Physical functioning (PF), general health (GH), RP, BP remained significantly lower in comparison to the FRR scores.

conclusionA relatively similar long-term outcome in the 3D-LC and MC patients is shown. Interestingly, five RAND-36 domains increased during five years follow-up, while four RAND-36 domains remained lower than FRR scores, which may indicate onset of possible new symptoms following cholecystectomy in long-term follow-up.

Indexed as

GallstonesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdultAgedCholecystectomyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome3D LaparoscopycholecystectomyCholelithiasislong-term outcomeRAND-36

Identifiers

PMID38688655
PMCPMC11059901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.