Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38688567›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

metaGWASmanager: a toolbox for an automated workflow from phenotypes to meta-analysis in GWAS consortia.

Zulema Rodriguez-Hernandez, Mathias Gorski, Maria Tellez-Plaza, Pascal Schlosser, Matthias Wuttke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zulema Rodriguez-HernandezIntegrative Epidemiology Group, Department of Chronic Diseases Epidemiology, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Health Institutes, Madrid, 28029, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0720-384X
Mathias GorskiDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, 93053, Germany.
Maria Tellez-PlazaIntegrative Epidemiology Group, Department of Chronic Diseases Epidemiology, National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Health Institutes, Madrid, 28029, Spain.
Pascal SchlosserInstitute of Genetic Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79106, Germany.
Matthias WuttkeInstitute of Genetic Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, 79106, Germany.

Funding

German Research Foundation 523737608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryThis article introduces the metaGWASmanager, which streamlines genome-wide association studies within large-scale meta-analysis consortia. It is a toolbox for both the central consortium analysis group and participating studies to generate homogeneous phenotypes, minimize unwanted variability from inconsistent methodologies, ensure high-quality association results, and implement time-efficient quality control workflows. The toolbox features a plug-in-based approach for customization of association testing.

resultsThe metaGWASmanager toolbox has been successfully deployed in both the CKDGen and MetalGWAS Initiative consortia across hundreds of participating studies, demonstrating its effectiveness in GWAS analysis optimization by automating routine tasks and ensuring the value and reliability of association results, thus, ultimately promoting scientific discovery. We provide a simulated data set with examples for script customization so that readers can reproduce the pipeline at their convenience. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GitHub: https://github.com/genepi-freiburg/metaGWASmanager.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPhenotypeSoftwareWorkflowHumansMeta-Analysis as Topic

Identifiers

PMID38688567
PMCPMC11096268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.