Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38688566›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2024

Policy uptake and implementation of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine in sub-Saharan African countries: status 2 years following the WHO recommendation.

Caroline Bonareri Osoro, Eleanor Ochodo, Titus K Kwambai, Jenifer Akoth Otieno, Lisa Were, Caleb Kimutai Sagam, Eddy Johnson Owino, Simon Kariuki, Feiko O Ter Kuile, Jenny Hill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Magnitude and durability of ProC6C-AlOH/Matrix-MHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Machine learning enables de novo multiepitope design ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caroline Bonareri OsoroCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya carolineosoro98@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2867-6224
Eleanor OchodoCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Titus K KwambaiCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Kisumu, Kenya.
Jenifer Akoth OtienoCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-624X
Lisa WereCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Caleb Kimutai SagamCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7316-3340
Eddy Johnson OwinoCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Simon KariukiCentre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
Feiko O Ter KuileDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Jenny HillDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1588-485X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In October 2021, the WHO recommended the world's first malaria vaccine-RTS,S/AS01-to prevent malaria in children living in areas with moderate-to-high transmission in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). A second malaria vaccine, R21/Matrix-M, was recommended for use in October 2023 and added to the WHO list of prequalified vaccines in December 2023. This study analysis assessed the country status of implementation and delivery strategies for RTS,S/AS01 by searching websites for national malaria policies, guidelines and related documents. Direct contact with individuals working in malaria programmes was made to obtain documents not publicly available. 10 countries had documents with information relating to malaria vaccine implementation, 7 referencing RTS,S/AS01 and 3 (Burkina Faso, Kenya and Nigeria) referencing RTS,S/AS01 and R21/Matrix-M. Five other countries reported plans for malaria vaccine roll-out without specifying which vaccine. Ghana, Kenya and Malawi, which piloted RTS,S/AS01, have now integrated the vaccine into routine immunisation services. Cameroon and Burkina Faso are the first countries outside the pilot countries to incorporate the vaccine into national immunisation services. Uganda plans a phased RTS,S/AS01 introduction, while Guinea plans to first pilot RTS,S/AS01 in five districts. The RTS,S/AS01 schedule varied by country, with the first dose administered at 5 or 6 months in all countries but the fourth dose at either 18, 22 or 24 months. SSA countries have shown widespread interest in rolling out the malaria vaccine, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization having approved financial support for 20 of 30 countries which applied as of March 2024. Limited availability of RTS,S/AS01 means that some approved countries will not receive the required doses. Vaccine availability and equity must be addressed even as R21/Matrix-M becomes available.

Indexed as

Malaria VaccinesWorld Health OrganizationAfrica South of the SaharaHealth PolicyHumansImmunization ProgramsMalariaMalaria VaccinesChild healthMalariaVaccines

Identifiers

PMID38688566
PMCPMC11085798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.