ArticleCurrent problems in cardiology2024
Intra- and inter-reader reproducibility in quantitative coronary plaque analysis on coronary computed tomography angiography.
Article in Current problems in cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning image reconstruction improves visualization of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout appearance on dual-energy CT for hepatocellular carcinoma: a non-inferiority study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Emerging quantitative CCTA imaging biomarkers for cardiovascular risk stratification: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in coronary CT angiography: transforming the diagnosis and risk stratification of atherosclerosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Review
- Interleukin-6 is associated with high-risk plaque on coronary computed tomography angiography in asymptomatic women.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Article
- Computed Tomography Angiography Identified High-Risk Coronary Plaques: From Diagnosis to Prognosis and Future Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCoronary artery plaque burden, low attenuation non-calcified plaque (LAP), and pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) on coronary CT angiography (CCTA), have been linked to future cardiac events. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intra- and inter reader reproducibility in the quantification of coronary plaque burden and its characteristics using an artificial intelligence-enhanced semi-automated software. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 10 women and 6 men, aged 52 (IQR 49-58) underwent CCTA using a Siemens Somatom Force, Somatom Definition AS and Somatom Definition Flash scanners. Two expert readers utilized dedicated semi-automatic software (vascuCAP, Elucid Bioimaging, Wenham, MA) to assess calcified plaque, low attenuation plaque and PCAT. Readers were blinded to all clinical information and repeated their analysis at 6 weeks in random order to minimize recall bias. Data analysis was performed on the right and left coronary arteries. Intra- and inter-reader reproducibility was compared using Pearson correlation coefficient, while absolute values between analyses and readers were compared with paired non-parametric tests. This is a sub-study of the Specialized Center of Research Excellence (SCORE) clinical trial (5U54AG062334).
resultsA total of 64 vessels from 16 patients were analyzed. Intra-reader Pearson correlation coefficients for calcified plaque volume, LAP volume and PCAT volumes were 0.96, 0.99 and 0.92 for reader 1 and 0.94, 0.94 and 0.95 for reader 2, respectively, (all p < 0.0001). Inter-reader Pearson correlation coefficients for calcified plaque volume, LAP and PCAT volumes were 0.92, 0.96 and 0.78, and 0.99, 0.99 and 0.93 on the second analyses, all had a p value <0.0001. There was no significant bias on the corresponding Bland-Altman analyses.
conclusionVolume measurement of coronary plaque burden and PCAT volume can be performed with high intra- and inter-reader agreement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.