Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38688323›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2024

Impact of the disruption in supply of varenicline since 2021 on smoking cessation in England: A population study.

Sarah E Jackson, Jamie Brown, Harry Tattan-Birch, Lion Shahab

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah E JacksonDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5658-6168
Jamie BrownDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2797-5428
Harry Tattan-BirchDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9410-8343
Lion ShahabDepartment of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4033-442X

Funding

Cancer Research UK PRCRPG-Nov21\100002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsVarenicline is one of the most effective smoking cessation treatments. Its supply in England was disrupted in July 2021 due to nitrosamine impurities found by its supplier, Pfizer. This study measured the impact of this disruption on smoking cessation in England. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsThe study used repeated cross-sectional surveys conducted monthly, from June 2018 to December 2022. Set in England, it comprised a total of 3024 adults who reported smoking during the past year and had made at least one serious attempt to quit in the past 6 months. MEASUREMENTS: Generalized additive models analyzed the association of the varenicline supply disruption with the trend in self-reported varenicline use in the most recent quit attempt. We used these results to estimate the population-level impact of the disruption on smoking cessation.

findingsBefore July 2021, the proportion of past 6-month quit attempts using varenicline was stable at approximately 3.9% [risk ratio (RR)

conclusionsIn England, the disruption in supply of varenicline since 2021 has coincided with a substantial fall in the use of varenicline in attempts to quit smoking.

Indexed as

Smoking CessationSmoking Cessation AgentsVareniclineAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultSmoking Cessation AgentsVareniclineChampixChantixpopulation studyquit attemptssmoking cessationvarenicline

Identifiers

PMID38688323
PMCPMC11753482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.