Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38688309›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN2024

Failure to Undergo Resection Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of SWOG S1505.

Jordan M Cloyd, Sarah Colby, Katherine A Guthrie, Andy M Lowy, E Gabrielle Chiorean, Phillip Philip, Davendra Sohal, Syed Ahmad

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jordan M CloydDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
Sarah ColbySWOG Statistical and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Katherine A GuthrieSWOG Statistical and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Andy M LowyDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA.
E Gabrielle ChioreanUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Phillip PhilipHenry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
Davendra SohalDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Syed AhmadDepartment of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center complex - extension supplement for GY06U10CA180819 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Michael L. LeBlanc · 2014 to 2026
$115.2M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180819NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly used for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and yet reasons for not undergoing subsequent pancreatectomy are poorly understood. Given the importance of completing multimodality therapy, we investigated factors associated with failure to undergo surgical resection following NT for PDAC.

methodsSWOG S1505 was a multicenter phase II randomized trial of preoperative mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel prior to planned pancreatectomy for patients with potentially resectable PDAC. Associations between clinical, demographic, and hospital-level characteristics and receipt of surgical resection were estimated via multiple logistic regression. Differences in overall survival from 18 weeks postrandomization (scheduled time of surgery) according to resection status were assessed via Cox regression models.

resultsAmong 102 eligible patients, 73 (71.6%) underwent successful pancreatectomy, whereas 29 (28.4%) did not, primarily because of progression (n=11; 10.8%) or toxicity during NT (n=9; 8.8%). Weight loss during NT (odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.11-0.93) and the hospital's city size (small: OR, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.07-0.80] and large: OR, 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10-0.79] compared with midsize) were significantly associated with a lower probability of surgical resection in adjusted models, whereas age, sex, race, body mass index, performance status, insurance type, geographic region, treatment arm, tumor location, chemotherapy delays/modifications, and hospital characteristics were not. Surgical resection following NT was associated with improved overall survival (median, 23.8 vs 10.8 months; P<.01) even after adjusting for grade 3-5 adverse events during NT, performance status, and body mass index (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.95).

conclusionsFailure to undergo resection following NT was relatively common among patients with potentially resectable PDAC and associated with worse survival. Although few predictive factors were identified in this secondary analysis of the SWOG S1505 randomized trial, further research must focus on risk factors for severe toxicities during NT that preclude surgical resection so that patient-centered interventions can be delivered or alternate treatment sequencing can be recommended.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoadjuvant TherapyPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAlbuminsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDeoxycytidineFemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansIrinotecanLeucovorinMale130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsDeoxycytidineFluorouracilfolfirinoxGemcitabineIrinotecanLeucovorinOxaliplatinPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID38688309
PMCPMC13264011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.