ArticlePediatric neurosurgery2024
Management of Pediatric Cavum Cysts: A Scoping Review and a Single Institution Case Series.
Article in Pediatric neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPediatric cavum cysts are a rare yet complicated pathology to manage. The literature is scarce, primarily consisting of case series, and lacking a consensus regarding clear management. In this scoping review, we aimed to compile existing information in the literature regarding the management of pediatric cavum cysts across the last 10 years. We also present our management of 19 patients, the largest case series to date, highlighting knowledge gaps surrounding the management of this salient pathology.
methodsA literature search using PubMed and SCOPUS was conducted using the following search terms: (pediatric) AND (Cavum septum pellucidum) OR (cavum vergae) OR (cavum velum interpositum) AND (management). Eligibility criteria included peer-reviewed publication published in the last 10 years, pediatric population, cavum cyst, and English language. A retrospective search was conducted for all pediatric cavum cysts between 2013 and 2023 at our institution. Clinical and radiographic characteristics as well as intervention and outcome data were collected for both the scoping review and our cases.
results330 total articles were populated using our search. 12 articles met our inclusion criteria. 41.7% (n = 5) of the articles were case series, 33.3% (n = 4) were case reports, 8.3% (n = 1) was a technical article, 8.3% (n = 1) was a systematic review, and 8.3% (n = 1) was a case questionnaire. Resolution of symptoms was noted in all articles of our scoping review, regardless of treatment modality. The average age in our case series was 9.84 years old and average age at diagnosis was 5.53 years old. 6 patients (31.6%) were female and 13 patients (68.4%) were male. 2 out of the 19 patients (10.5%) were surgically treated.
conclusionThere is no clear consensus on the management of cavum cysts. A prospective, multicenter study is needed to create standardized pediatric cyst management guidelines. The current thought is that surgical intervention should be saved for those patients with obstructive hydrocephalus and signs of intracranial hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.