Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38687879›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2024

Paramagnetic Effects in NMR Spectroscopy of Transition-Metal Complexes: Principles and Chemical Concepts.

Jan Novotny, Stanislav Komorovsky, Radek Marek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Efficient Machine Learning Prediction of Solvent-DependentJournal of computational chemistry · 2026
    Article
  8. Tracking Structural and Electron Spin Density Changes in a Cooperative MnAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan NovotnyCEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-1203-9549
Stanislav KomorovskyInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-84536 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-5317-7200
Radek MarekCEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-625 00 Brno, Czechia.ORCID 0000-0002-3668-3523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ConspectusMagnetic resonance techniques represent a fundamental class of spectroscopic methods used in physics, chemistry, biology, and medicine. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) is an extremely powerful technique for characterizing systems with an open-shell electronic nature, whereas nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) has traditionally been used to investigate diamagnetic (closed-shell) systems. However, these two techniques are tightly connected by the electron-nucleus hyperfine interaction operating in paramagnetic (open-shell) systems. Hyperfine interaction of the nuclear spin with unpaired electron(s) induces large temperature-dependent shifts of nuclear resonance frequencies that are designated as hyperfine NMR shifts (δ

Identifiers

PMID38687879
PMCPMC11112740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.