Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38687784›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Development of porcine skeletal muscle extracellular matrix-derived hydrogels with improved properties and low immunogenicity.

Mohammed A Barajaa, Takayoshi Otsuka, Debolina Ghosh, Ho-Man Kan, Cato T Laurencin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. A novel protocol for the direct isolation of a highly pure and regenerative population of satellite stem cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammed A BarajaaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 34212, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1987-3739
Takayoshi OtsukaThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030.ORCID 0000-0002-7954-0637
Debolina GhoshThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030.ORCID 0000-0002-8681-9812
Ho-Man KanThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030.
Cato T LaurencinThe Cato T. Laurencin Institute for Regenerative Engineering, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT 06030.ORCID 0000-0001-6765-3047

Funding

Regenerative Engineering of Musculoskeletal Tissues- a Convergence Doctoral Training ProgramT32AR079114 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LAURENCIN, CATO T. · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR079114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrogels derived from decellularized extracellular matrices (ECM) of animal origin show immense potential for regenerative applications due to their excellent cytocompatibility and biomimetic properties. Despite these benefits, the impact of decellularization protocols on the properties and immunogenicity of these hydrogels remains relatively unexplored. In this study, porcine skeletal muscle ECM (smECM) underwent decellularization using mechanical disruption (MD) and two commonly employed decellularization detergents, sodium deoxycholate (SDC) or Triton X-100. To mitigate immunogenicity associated with animal-derived ECM, all decellularized tissues were enzymatically treated with α-galactosidase to cleave the primary xenoantigen-the α-Gal antigen. Subsequently, the impact of the different decellularization protocols on the resultant hydrogels was thoroughly investigated. All methods significantly reduced total DNA content in hydrogels. Moreover, α-galactosidase treatment was crucial for cleaving α-Gal antigens, suggesting that conventional decellularization methods alone are insufficient. MD preserved total protein, collagen, sulfated glycosaminoglycan, laminin, fibronectin, and growth factors more efficiently than other protocols. The decellularization method impacted hydrogel gelation kinetics and ultrastructure, as confirmed by turbidimetric and scanning electron microscopy analyses. MD hydrogels demonstrated high cytocompatibility, supporting satellite stem cell recruitment, growth, and differentiation into multinucleated myofibers. In contrast, the SDC and Triton X-100 protocols exhibited cytotoxicity. Comprehensive in vivo immunogenicity assessments in a subcutaneous xenotransplantation model revealed MD hydrogels' biocompatibility and low immunogenicity. These findings highlight the significant influence of the decellularization protocol on hydrogel properties. Our results suggest that combining MD with α-galactosidase treatment is an efficient method for preparing low-immunogenic smECM-derived hydrogels with enhanced properties for skeletal muscle regenerative engineering and clinical applications.

Indexed as

Extracellular MatrixHydrogelsMuscle, Skeletalalpha-GalactosidaseAnimalsDecellularized Extracellular MatrixDeoxycholic AcidMiceOctoxynolSwineTissue Engineeringalpha-GalactosidaseDecellularized Extracellular MatrixDeoxycholic AcidHydrogelsOctoxynolextracellular matrix–derived hydrogelsimmunogenicitymuscle regenerationtissue-specificα-galactosidase

Identifiers

PMID38687784
PMCPMC11087813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.