Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38687760›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The implicit power of positive thinking: The effect of positive episodic simulation on implicit future expectancies.

Rachel J Anderson, J Helgi Clayton McClure, Emma Bishop, David Howe, Kevin J Riggs, Stephen A Dewhurst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel J AndersonSchool of Psychology and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9191-0004
J Helgi Clayton McClureSchool of Psychology and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6858-3116
Emma BishopSchool of Psychology and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
David HoweSchool of Psychology and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Kevin J RiggsSchool of Psychology and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Stephen A DewhurstSchool of Psychology and Social Work, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research demonstrating that positive episodic simulation enhances future expectancies has relied on explicit expectancy measures. The current study investigated the effects of episodic simulation on implicit expectancies. Using the Future Thinking Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (FT-IRAP), participants made true/false decisions to indicate whether or not they expected positive/negative outcomes after adopting orientations consistent or inconsistent with an optimistic disposition. The outcome measure, DIRAP, was based on response time differences between consistent and inconsistent blocks. Participants then engaged in either positive simulation training, in which they imagined positive future events, or a neutral visualisation task before repeating the FT-IRAP twice following 10-minute intervals. Positive simulation training increased DIRAP scores for don't-expect-negative trials-boosting participants' readiness to affirm that negative events were unlikely to happen to them. Although findings did not generalise across all trial types, they show potential for positive simulation training to enhance implicit future expectancies.

Indexed as

ThinkingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansImaginationMaleReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38687760
PMCPMC11060537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.