Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38687755›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Effectiveness of the Integrated Dengue Education and Learning (iDEAL) module in improving the knowledge, attitude, practice, environmental cleanliness index, and dengue index among schoolchildren: A randomised controlled trial protocol.

Rahmat Dapari, Kalaivani Muniandy, Ahmad Zaid Fattah Azman, Suhaili Abu Bakar, Mohd Nasir Mohd Desa, Lim Chee Hwa, Sukhvinder Singh Sandhu, Nooreen Farzana Mustapha, Norazman Mohd Rosli, Mohd 'Ammar Ihsan Ahmad Zamzuri and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rahmat DapariFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3915-0340
Kalaivani MuniandyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Ahmad Zaid Fattah AzmanFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-2906-9007
Suhaili Abu BakarFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Mohd Nasir Mohd DesaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0200-4796
Lim Chee HwaFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Sukhvinder Singh SandhuSelangor State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nooreen Farzana MustaphaSelangor State Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-9484-1123
Norazman Mohd RosliKuala Lumpur and Putrajaya Health Department, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Mohd 'Ammar Ihsan Ahmad ZamzuriNegeri Sembilan State Health Department, Seremban, Seremban, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-2381-0068
Mohd Rohaizat HassanDepartment of Community Health, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-4658-6532
Nazri Che DomFaculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Bandar Puncak Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9882-3501
Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul RahimFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-9090-2563
Balvinder Singh GillInstitute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nurulhusna Ab HamidMedical Entomology Unit, Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Ministry of Health Malaysia, Setia Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Universiti Putra Malaysia · MYMinistry of Health · MYMalaysia Theological Seminary · MYNational University of Malaysia · MYUniversiti of Malaysia Sabah · MYUniversiti Teknologi MARA · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDengue is a mosquito-borne disease caused by four distinct, closely related dengue viruses (DENV). Global dengue incidence has markedly increased in the past decades. The World Health Organization reported that cases increased from 505,430 in 2000 to 5.2 million in 2019. Similarly, the total dengue cases in Malaysia increased from 7,103 in 2000 to a peak of 130,101 in 2019. Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) remain the most effective dengue prevention and control tools. Furthermore, school-based health education is key to enhancing knowledge and raising awareness of the seriousness of dengue among schoolchildren and transferring knowledge and practice from classrooms to homes. Thus, it is necessary to plan an integrated module for the primary prevention of dengue infection, specifically among schoolchildren.

aimsThe present study intends to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of a theory-based integrated dengue education and learning (iDEAL) module in improving the KAP, environmental cleanliness index, and dengue index among schoolchildren in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur.

methodsThis study is a single-blinded, cluster randomised controlled trial to be conducted from 1 September 2023 to 31 August 2025. The study will involve 20 primary and 20 secondary schools in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur. The 1600 participants will be randomly allocated to intervention and control groups based on selected clusters to avoid contamination. A cluster is a comparable school that fulfils the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The intervention group will receive the iDEAL module, while the control group will receive standard education. The iDEAL module will be developed following a systematic procedure and delivered in-person by trained researchers to the participants. The outcome will be measured using validated, self-administered questionnaires at baseline (T0), immediately (T1), one month (T2), and three months (T3) post-intervention to measure the intervention module effectiveness. The data will be analysed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 28 and descriptive and inferential statistics. Within-group changes over time will be compared using one-way repeated measure analysis of variance for continuous and normally distributed variables. Within-group analysis of categorical data will use Cochran's Q test. The main effect and interaction between and within the intervention and control groups at T0, T1, T2, and T3 will be tested using the generalised linear mixed model (GLMM). Hypothetically, the KAP, environmental cleanliness index, and dengue index among the intervention group will be significantly improved compared to the control group. The hypothesis will be tested using a significance level with a p-value of 0.05 and a confidence interval of 95%.

conclusionsThe study protocol outlines developing and testing an iDEAL module for schoolchildren in Selangor and Kuala Lumpur, with no socio-demographic differences expected. The intervention aims to improve KAP, environmental cleanliness index, and dengue index, potentially reducing dengue risk. Results could inform public health policies, emphasizing school-based interventions' importance in combating diseases like dengue.

Indexed as

DengueHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalaysiaMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchoolsStudents

Identifiers

PMID38687755
PMCPMC11060578
OpenAlexW4396508122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.