ArticlePloS one2024
Field evaluation of a novel semi-quantitative point-of-care diagnostic for G6PD deficiency in Indonesia.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of quantitative point-of-care tests to measure G6PD activity: An individual participant data meta-analysis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Pooled it
- G6PD deficiency in Indonesia: a systematic review and update of prevalence and variant maps in the context of malaria elimination.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe WHO recommends routine testing of G6PD activity to guide radical cure in patients with Plasmodium vivax malaria. Females may have intermediate G6PD enzyme activity and to date, only complex diagnostics are able to reliably identify them. The semi-quantitative G6PD diagnostic "One Step G6PD Test" (Humasis, RoK; "RDT") is a lateral flow assay that can distinguish deficient, intermediate, and normal G6PD status and offers a simpler diagnostic alternative.
methodsG6PD status of participants enrolled in Malinau and Nunukan Regencies and the capital Jakarta was assessed with the RDT, and G6PD activity was measured in duplicate by reference spectrophotometry. The adjusted male median (AMM) of the spectrophotometry measurements was defined as 100% activity; 70% and 30% of the AMM were defined as thresholds for intermediate and deficient G6PD status, respectively. Results were compared to those derived from spectrophotometry at the clinically relevant G6PD activity thresholds of 30% and 70%.
resultsOf the 161 participants enrolled, 10 (6.2%) were G6PD deficient and 12 (7.5%) had intermediate G6PD activity by spectrophotometry. At the 30% threshold, the sensitivity of the RDT was 10.0% (95%CI: 0.3-44.5%) with a specificity of 99.3% (95%CI: 96.4-100.0%); the positive predictive value was 50.0% (95%CI: 1.3-98.7%) and the negative predictive value 94.3% (95%CI: 89.5-97.4%). The corresponding figures at the 70% threshold were 22.7% (95%CI: 7.8-45.4%), 100.0% (95%CI: 97.4-100.0%), 100.0% (95%CI: 47.8-100.0%) and 89.1% (95%CI: 83.1-93.5%), respectively.
conclusionWhile there is a dire need for an easy-to-use, economical, semi-quantitative diagnostic for the point of care, the observed performance of the "One Step G6PD Test" in its current form was insufficient to guide antimalarial treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.