Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38687503›Full record

GuidelineJAMA2024

Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

US Preventive Services Task Force, Wanda K Nicholson, Michael Silverstein, John B Wong, Michael J Barry, David Chelmow, Tumaini Rucker Coker, Esa M Davis, Carlos Roberto Jaén, Marie Krousel-Wood and 9 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in JAMA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 253 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
253citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

253 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Does Messaging for Reducing Breast Cancer Overscreening in Older Women Have Differential Responses among Medical Minimizers and Maximizers?Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

193 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

US Preventive Services Task Force
Wanda K NicholsonGeorge Washington University, Washington, DC.
Michael SilversteinBrown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
John B WongTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael J BarryHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
David ChelmowVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Tumaini Rucker CokerUniversity of Washington, Seattle.
Esa M DavisUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Carlos Roberto JaénThe University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.
Marie Krousel-WoodTulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Sei LeeUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Li LiUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Carol M MangioneUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Goutham RaoCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
John M RuizUniversity of Arizona, Tucson.
James J StevermerUniversity of Missouri, Columbia.
Joel TsevatThe University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.
Sandra Millon UnderwoodUniversity of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Sarah WieheIndiana University, Bloomington.

Funding

Prognostic Indices for Hospitalized Older Adults with and without Alzheimer’s Disease and Related DementiasR01AG079982 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI Sei Lee, Alexander Keliimoeanu Smith · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Mentoring Patient-Oriented Research to Individualize Care for Hospitalized Older Adults with and without Alzheimer's Disease and Related DementiasK24AG066998 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sei Lee · 2021 to 2026
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG066998NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Among all US women, breast cancer is the second most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death. In 2023, an estimated 43 170 women died of breast cancer. Non-Hispanic White women have the highest incidence of breast cancer and non-Hispanic Black women have the highest mortality rate. Objective: The USPSTF commissioned a systematic review to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of different mammography-based breast cancer screening strategies by age to start and stop screening, screening interval, modality, use of supplemental imaging, or personalization of screening for breast cancer on the incidence of and progression to advanced breast cancer, breast cancer morbidity, and breast cancer-specific or all-cause mortality, and collaborative modeling studies to complement the evidence from the review. Population: Cisgender women and all other persons assigned female at birth aged 40 years or older at average risk of breast cancer. Evidence Assessment: The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that biennial screening mammography in women aged 40 to 74 years has a moderate net benefit. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence is insufficient to determine the balance of benefits and harms of screening mammography in women 75 years or older and the balance of benefits and harms of supplemental screening for breast cancer with breast ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), regardless of breast density. Recommendation: The USPSTF recommends biennial screening mammography for women aged 40 to 74 years. (B recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening mammography in women 75 years or older. (I statement) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of supplemental screening for breast cancer using breast ultrasonography or MRI in women identified to have dense breasts on an otherwise negative screening mammogram. (I statement).

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMammographyAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMass ScreeningMiddle AgedUltrasonography, MammaryUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38687503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.