Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38687463›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2024

Timing Matters: A Machine Learning Method for the Prioritization of Drug-Drug Interactions Through Signal Detection in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Their Relationship with Time of Co-exposure.

Vera Battini, Marianna Cocco, Maria Antonietta Barbieri, Greg Powell, Carla Carnovale, Emilio Clementi, Andrew Bate, Maurizio Sessa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vera BattiniDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. vera.battini@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3513-9593
Marianna CoccoDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria Antonietta BarbieriDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2019-4696
Greg PowellSafety Innovation and Analytics, GSK, Durham, NC, USA.
Carla CarnovalePharmacovigilance and Clinical Research, International Centre for Pesticides and Health Risk Prevention, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), ASST Fatebenefratelli, Sacco University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4107-196X
Emilio ClementiPharmacovigilance and Clinical Research, International Centre for Pesticides and Health Risk Prevention, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), ASST Fatebenefratelli, Sacco University Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7333-8270
Maurizio SessaDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0874-4744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent drug-drug interaction (DDI) detection methods often miss the aspect of temporal plausibility, leading to false-positive disproportionality signals in spontaneous reporting system (SRS) databases.

objectiveThis study aims to develop a method for detecting and prioritizing temporally plausible disproportionality signals of DDIs in SRS databases by incorporating co-exposure time in disproportionality analysis.

methodsThe method was tested in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The CRESCENDDI dataset of positive controls served as the primary source of true-positive DDIs. Disproportionality analysis was performed considering the time of co-exposure. Temporal plausibility was assessed using the flex point of cumulative reporting of disproportionality signals. Potential confounders were identified using a machine learning method (i.e. Lasso regression).

resultsDisproportionality analysis was conducted on 122 triplets with more than three cases, resulting in the prioritization of 61 disproportionality signals (50.0%) involving 13 adverse events, with 61.5% of these included in the European Medicine Agency's (EMA's) Important Medical Event (IME) list. A total of 27 signals (44.3%) had at least ten cases reporting the triplet of interest, and most of them (n = 19; 70.4%) were temporally plausible. The retrieved confounders were mainly other concomitant drugs.

conclusionsOur method was able to prioritize disproportionality signals with temporal plausibility. This finding suggests a potential for our method in pinpointing signals that are more likely to be furtherly validated.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDrug InteractionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMachine LearningUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationDatabases, FactualHumansPharmacovigilanceTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38687463
PMCPMC11324675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.