ArticleDrug safety2024
Timing Matters: A Machine Learning Method for the Prioritization of Drug-Drug Interactions Through Signal Detection in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Their Relationship with Time of Co-exposure.
Article in Drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety Monitoring of High-Risk Antibiotics Using Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review with Focus on Real-World Evidence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring the Reliability of Detecting Drug-Drug Interactions that Increase the Risk of Gestational Diabetes in Adverse Event Reporting Systems.Drug safety · 2026Article
- Drug-specific safety signal prioritization of antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: integrating FAERS pharmacovigilance, machine learning, and clinical contextualization.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Comparative safety signal prioritization of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: a FAERS pharmacovigilance, machine learning, and clinical contextualization study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in pharmacovigilance: a narrative review and practical experience with an expert-defined Bayesian network tool.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Review
- Disproportionality analysis and risk factor assessment of drug-associated thyroid dysfunction adverse events: a study based on the FAERS database.Endocrine connections · 2025Article
- A disproportionality analysis of cardiac arrhythmia associated with bisphosphonates based on the FAERS database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Toward the future management of patients with CML and Ph + ALL: real-world safety insights from dasatinib pharmacovigilance.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Hepatotoxicity of antipsychotics: an exploratory pharmacoepidemiologic and pharmacodynamic study integrating FAERS data andFrontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCurrent drug-drug interaction (DDI) detection methods often miss the aspect of temporal plausibility, leading to false-positive disproportionality signals in spontaneous reporting system (SRS) databases.
objectiveThis study aims to develop a method for detecting and prioritizing temporally plausible disproportionality signals of DDIs in SRS databases by incorporating co-exposure time in disproportionality analysis.
methodsThe method was tested in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The CRESCENDDI dataset of positive controls served as the primary source of true-positive DDIs. Disproportionality analysis was performed considering the time of co-exposure. Temporal plausibility was assessed using the flex point of cumulative reporting of disproportionality signals. Potential confounders were identified using a machine learning method (i.e. Lasso regression).
resultsDisproportionality analysis was conducted on 122 triplets with more than three cases, resulting in the prioritization of 61 disproportionality signals (50.0%) involving 13 adverse events, with 61.5% of these included in the European Medicine Agency's (EMA's) Important Medical Event (IME) list. A total of 27 signals (44.3%) had at least ten cases reporting the triplet of interest, and most of them (n = 19; 70.4%) were temporally plausible. The retrieved confounders were mainly other concomitant drugs.
conclusionsOur method was able to prioritize disproportionality signals with temporal plausibility. This finding suggests a potential for our method in pinpointing signals that are more likely to be furtherly validated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.