Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38687418›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024

Macrolide resistance among Streptococcus agalactiae during COVID-19 public health emergency in Brazil.

Rosana Rocha Barros, Clarissa Campos Barros, Fabíola C Oliveira Kegele, Maria Francisca da S N Soares, Geraldo Renato de Paula

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dairy FarmPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Antibiotic Resistance and Serotypes Distribution inPolish journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rosana Rocha BarrosDepartamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Hernani de Melo 101 sala 304, 24210-130, Niterói, RJ, Brazil. rrbarros@id.uff.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2440-7844
Clarissa Campos BarrosDepartamento de Microbiologia e Parasitologia, Instituto Biomédico, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Hernani de Melo 101 sala 304, 24210-130, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Fabíola C Oliveira KegeleInstituto Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Rui Barbosa 716, 22250-020, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Maria Francisca da S N SoaresInstituto Fernandes Figueira, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Rui Barbosa 716, 22250-020, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Geraldo Renato de PaulaFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rua Dr. Mário Viana 523, 24241-000, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro APQ1 211.681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During COVID-19 public health emergence, azithromycin was excessively used in Brazil, as part of a controversial "early treatment", recommended by former national health authorities. Excessive usage of macrolides may increase resistance rates among beta-hemolytic streptococci. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the occurrence of resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin among Streptococcus agalactiae recovered from February 2020 to May 2023. Bacterial isolates (n = 116) were obtained from pregnant women and submitted to antimicrobial susceptibility testing, investigation of macrolide resistance phenotypes and genotypes, and identification of capsular type. The overall rate of erythromycin not susceptible (NS) isolates was 25.9%, while resistance to clindamycin was 5.2%. Drug efflux, associated with the M phenotype and mef(A) gene, was the prevalent mechanism of resistance (80%). Capsular type Ia was predominant (39.8%), followed by II, III, and V (17.7% each). A higher diversity of types was observed in the last years of the study. Type IV has had an increasing trend over time, being the fourth most common in 2023. The majority of the isolates that expressed the M phenotype presented capsular type Ia, while those with iMLS phenotype presented capsular type V. Despite no causal relationship can be established, azithromycin excessive usage may be a possible factor associated with this higher rate of erythromycin NS isolates, compared with most previous national studies. On the other hand, resistance to clindamycin has not changed significantly. Therefore, in the studied clinical setting, clindamycin remains a useful alternative to intrapartum prophylaxis among penicillin-allergic pregnant women.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCOVID-19Drug Resistance, BacterialMacrolidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSARS-CoV-2Streptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus agalactiaeBrazilClindamycinErythromycinFemaleHumansPregnancyPublic HealthAnti-Bacterial AgentsClindamycinErythromycinMacrolidesMicrobial drug resistancePregnant womenStreptococcus agalactiae

Identifiers

PMID38687418
PMCPMC11153377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.