Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38687190›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Associations of combined phenotypic aging and genetic risk with incident cancer: A prospective cohort study.

Lijun Bian, Zhimin Ma, Xiangjin Fu, Chen Ji, Tianpei Wang, Caiwang Yan, Juncheng Dai, Hongxia Ma, Zhibin Hu, Hongbing Shen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Lijun Bian *Department of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhimin Ma *Department of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiangjin FuDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Chen JiDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Tianpei WangDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Caiwang YanDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Juncheng DaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hongxia MaDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Zhibin HuDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-5234
Hongbing ShenDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Lu WangDepartment of Chronic Non-Communicable Disease Control, The Affiliated Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China.
Meng ZhuDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5122-1733
Guangfu JinDepartment of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0249-5337
China International Science and Technology Cooperation · CNCenter for Global Health · USAcademy of Medical Sciences · GBTaiwan Centers for Disease Control · TW

Funding

Excellent Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20220100National Natural Science Foundation of China 82125033National Natural Science Foundation of China 82230110National Natural Science Foundation of China 82273714National Natural Science Foundation of China 82388102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Age is the most important risk factor for cancer, but aging rates are heterogeneous across individuals. We explored a new measure of aging-Phenotypic Age (PhenoAge)-in the risk prediction of site-specific and overall cancer. Methods: Using Cox regression models, we examined the association of Phenotypic Age Acceleration (PhenoAgeAccel) with cancer incidence by genetic risk group among 374,463 participants from the UK Biobank. We generated PhenoAge using chronological age and nine biomarkers, PhenoAgeAccel after subtracting the effect of chronological age by regression residual, and an incidence-weighted overall cancer polygenic risk score (CPRS) based on 20 cancer site-specific polygenic risk scores (PRSs). Results: Compared with biologically younger participants, those older had a significantly higher risk of overall cancer, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.22 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.27) in men, and 1.26 (1.22-1.31) in women, respectively. A joint effect of genetic risk and PhenoAgeAccel was observed on overall cancer risk, with HRs of 2.29 (2.10-2.51) for men and 1.94 (1.78-2.11) for women with high genetic risk and older PhenoAge compared with those with low genetic risk and younger PhenoAge. PhenoAgeAccel was negatively associated with the number of healthy lifestyle factors (Beta = -1.01 in men, p<0.001; Beta = -0.98 in women, p<0.001). Conclusions: Within and across genetic risk groups, older PhenoAge was consistently related to an increased risk of incident cancer with adjustment for chronological age and the aging process could be retarded by adherence to a healthy lifestyle. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82230110, 82125033, 82388102 to GJ; 82273714 to MZ); and the Excellent Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20220100 to MZ).

Indexed as

AgingNeoplasmsPhenotypeAdultAgedFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited Kingdomcancer biologycancer riskepidemiologyglobal healthhealthy lifestylehumanphenotypic agingpolygenic risk score

Identifiers

PMID38687190
PMCPMC11060710
OpenAlexW4390693982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.