Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38687177›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Evaluating the development of endometriosis and adenomyosis lesions over time: An ultrasound study of symptomatic women.

Sofie Orlov, Povilas Sladkevicius, Ligita Jokubkiene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sofie OrlovObstetric, Gynecological and Prenatal Ultrasound Research, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmo, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9200-206X
Povilas SladkeviciusObstetric, Gynecological and Prenatal Ultrasound Research, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmo, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9563-8135
Ligita JokubkieneObstetric, Gynecological and Prenatal Ultrasound Research, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmo, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0758-3507

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a gap in knowledge regarding development of endometriosis and adenomyosis lesions visible at transvaginal ultrasound. The objectives were to evaluate if women with symptoms suggestive of endometriosis or adenomyosis but normal ultrasound examination develop endometriosis or adenomyosis lesions visible at ultrasound over time and if alterations of symptoms over time are associated with ultrasound findings at follow-up. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis was a prospective cohort study of 100 symptomatic women with normal initial ultrasound examination during 2014-2017 who underwent follow-up ultrasound examination in 2022. Symptoms suggestive of endometriosis were assessed using visual analog scale at both examinations and minimal clinically important difference of 10 mm was considered as a significant alteration. An examiner with expertise in advanced ultrasound examination of endometriosis performed transvaginal ultrasound examinations in accordance with the consensus protocol by the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis group.

resultsAt follow-up ultrasound examination of 100 women, 13 (13% [95% CI 7.1-21.2]) had visible endometriosis or adenomyosis lesions, 8 (8% [95% CI 3.5-15.2]) had endometriosis lesions, and 6 (6% [95% CI 2.2-12.6]) had adenomyosis. At follow-up, women with endometriosis or adenomyosis lesions reported lower intensity of dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain compared to women without lesions (48 mm [IQR 16-79] vs. 73 mm [IQR 46-85] and 45 mm [IQR 26-57] vs. 57 mm [IQR 36-75], p = 0.087 and p = 0.026, respectively). None of the women with endometriosis or adenomyosis lesions reported increased intensity of dysmenorrhea at follow-up, compared to 32/86 women (37%) without lesions (p = 0.008). Increased intensity of chronic pelvic pain tended to be less common in women with lesions compared to those without (3/13 [23%] vs. 35/86 [41%], p = 0.223).

conclusionsOur findings suggest that in symptomatic women, endometriosis and adenomyosis lesions visible at ultrasound may develop over time. However, majority of women remain having normal ultrasound examinations despite symptoms. Exacerbation of dysmenorrhea or chronic pelvic pain during follow-up was not associated with the development of endometriosis or adenomyosis lesions visible at ultrasound, suggesting that even women with less severe symptoms might benefit from a follow-up ultrasound when indicated.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisEndometriosisUltrasonographyAdultCohort StudiesDysmenorrheaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPelvic PainProspective Studiesadenomyosisdysmenorrheaendometriosisfollow‐upnatural historypelvic painultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38687177
PMCPMC11266643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.