ArticleActa ophthalmologica2025
Performance of a simplified strategy for formula constant optimisation in intraocular lens power calculation.
Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of Contemporary Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas Based on Swept-Source OCT Biometry in Eyes with Capsular Tension Ring.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- A two-step formula constant optimization strategy for minimal standard deviation and zero mean prediction error in IOL power calculation.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- Jackknife and bootstrapping resampling techniques to evaluate the precision of lens formula constants.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
- Factors affecting the refractive error after cataract surgery.International ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Studying the added effect of sum-of-segments biometry to modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for short eyes.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Performance of a simplified strategy for formula constant optimisation in intraocular lens power calculation.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the performance of a simple prediction scheme for the formula constants optimised for a mean refractive prediction error.
methodsAnalysis based on a dataset of 888 eyes before and after cataract surgery with IOL implantation (Hoya Vivinex). IOLMaster 700 biometric data, power of the implanted lens and postoperative spherical equivalent refraction were used to calculate the optimised constants (.)
results(.)
conclusionThis simple prediction scheme for formula constant optimisation for zero mean refraction error performs excellently in our monocentric dataset, even for larger deviations of the start value from (.)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.