ArticleeLife2024
Digital wearable insole-based identification of knee arthropathies and gait signatures using machine learning.
Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Based Measurement Tools for Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis Identification Using Wearable Plantar Pressure: Secondary Cross-Sectional Analysis of Interpretable Framework Integrating Biomechanical Descriptors and the Multiscale Synergy Index.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Leakage-Resistant Evaluation of Gait Mat and Multisensor Biomechanical Features for Knee Osteoarthritis Screening: A Subject-Level Data Integrity Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Translation of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Gait Analysis Using Plantar Pressure and Ground Reaction Force.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reliability of a wireless instrumented insole (WalkinSense system) for measuring spatiotemporal and kinematic gait variables.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Personalizing the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis.SMART-MD journal of precision medicine · 2026Article
- Gait Pattern Differences Between Young Adults and Physically Active Older Adults.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Application of artificial muscle e-rubber for healthcare sensing: verification of measurement properties as a smart insole.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Editorial: Advanced biocompatible piezoelectrics - synthesis, characterization, and applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gait is impaired in musculoskeletal conditions, such as knee arthropathy. Gait analysis is used in clinical practice to inform diagnosis and monitor disease progression or intervention response. However, clinical gait analysis relies on subjective visual observation of walking as objective gait analysis has not been possible within clinical settings due to the expensive equipment, large-scale facilities, and highly trained staff required. Relatively low-cost wearable digital insoles may offer a solution to these challenges. In this work, we demonstrate how a digital insole measuring osteoarthritis-specific gait signatures yields similar results to the clinical gait-lab standard. To achieve this, we constructed a machine learning model, trained on force plate data collected in participants with knee arthropathy and controls. This model was highly predictive of force plate data from a validation set (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [auROC] = 0.86; area under the precision-recall curve [auPR] = 0.90) and of a separate, independent digital insole dataset containing control and knee osteoarthritis subjects (auROC = 0.83; auPR = 0.86). After showing that digital insole-derived gait characteristics are comparable to traditional gait measurements, we next showed that a single stride of raw sensor time-series data could be accurately assigned to each subject, highlighting that individuals using digital insoles can be identified by their gait characteristics. This work provides a framework for a promising alternative to traditional clinical gait analysis methods, adds to the growing body of knowledge regarding wearable technology analytical pipelines, and supports clinical development of at-home gait assessments, with the potential to improve the ease, frequency, and depth of patient monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.