Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38686635›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Identifying priority areas to support primary care engagement in breast cancer survivorship care: A Delphi study.

Lisa Mikesell, Denalee M O'Malley, Rachel T Kurtzman, Jenna Howard, Benjamin Bates, Jennifer R Hemler, Sarah J Fadem, Jeanne M Ferrante, Alicja Bator, Shawna V Hudson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa MikesellSchool of Communication and Information, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6410-2805
Denalee M O'MalleyDepartment of Family Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Rachel T KurtzmanDepartment of Family Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Jenna HowardDepartment of Family Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Benjamin BatesInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Jennifer R HemlerDepartment of Family Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Sarah J FademDepartment of Family Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Jeanne M FerranteInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Alicja BatorDepartment of Family Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Shawna V HudsonInstitute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Benjamin F CrabtreeDepartment of Family Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

Diversity Supplement to Adapting and implementing evidence-based breast cancer follow-up in primary careR01CA257197 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HUDSON, SHAWNA V. · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
Optimizing Colorectal Cancer Screening among Patients with Diabetes in Safety-Net Primary Care Settings: Targeting Implementation ApproachesR00CA256043 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI O'MALLEY, DENALEE M. · 2022 to 2024
$656k
NCI NIH HHS R00CA25604NCI NIH HHS R00 CA256043NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257197NCI NIH HHS R01CA257197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExisting approaches in cancer survivorship care delivery have proven to be insufficient to engage primary care. This study aimed to identify stakeholder-informed priorities to improve primary care engagement in breast cancer survivorship care.

methodsExperts in U.S. cancer survivorship care delivery were invited to participate in a 4-round online Delphi panel to identify and evaluate priorities for defining and fostering primary care's engagement in breast cancer survivorship. Panelists were asked to identify and then assess (ratings of 1-9) the importance and feasibility of priority items to support primary care engagement in survivorship. Panelists were asked to review the group results and reevaluate the importance and feasibility of each item, aiming to reach consensus.

resultsRespondent panelists (n = 23, response rate 57.5%) identified 31 priority items to support survivorship care. Panelists consistently rated three items most important (scored 9) but with uncertain feasibility (scored 5-6). These items emphasized the need to foster connections and improve communication between primary care and oncology. Panelists reached consensus on four items evaluated as important and feasible: (1) educating patients on survivorship, (2) enabling screening reminders and monitoring alerts in the electronic medical record, (3) identifying patient resources for clinicians to recommend, and (4) distributing accessible reference guides of common breast cancer drugs.

conclusionRole clarity and communication between oncology and primary care were rated as most important; however, uncertainty about feasibility remains. These findings indicate that cross-disciplinary capacity building to address feasibility issues may be needed to make the most important priority items actionable in primary care.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsDelphi TechniquePrimary Health CareConsensusFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurvivorshipbreast cancercommunicationDelphi panelprimary caresurvivorship care

Identifiers

PMID38686635
PMCPMC11058672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.