Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38686627›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

DFMO inhibition of neuroblastoma tumorigenesis.

Divya Gandra, David H Mulama, David M Foureau, Kimberly Q McKinney, Elizabeth Kim, Kaitlyn Smith, Jason Haw, Abhinav Nagulapally, Giselle L Saulnier Sholler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. STELLAR: Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Eflornithine Plus Lomustine Versus Lomustine Alone in Patients With Recurrent Grade 3 Astrocytoma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Epigenetic crosstalk in neuroblastoma development and progression.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Polyamine metabolism and anti-tumor immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Divya GandraDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
David H MulamaDepartment of Pediatrics, Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
David M FoureauDepartment of Medicine, Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4230-8356
Kimberly Q McKinneyDepartment of Pediatrics, Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Elizabeth KimDepartment of Pediatrics, Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Kaitlyn SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Jason HawDepartment of Pediatrics, Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Abhinav NagulapallyDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Giselle L Saulnier ShollerDepartment of Pediatrics, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5599-4757
Levine Children's Hospital · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USLevine Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Beat Childhood Cancer FoundationBrooke's Blossoming Hope FoundationEthan's Rodeo, Meryl and Charles Witmer Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost high-risk neuroblastoma patients who relapse succumb to disease despite the existing therapy. We recently reported increased event-free and overall survival in neuroblastoma patients receiving difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) during maintenance therapy. The effect of DFMO on cellular processes associated with neuroblastoma tumorigenesis needs further elucidation. Previous studies have shown cytotoxicity with IC50 values >5-15 mM, these doses are physiologically unattainable in patients, prompting further mechanistic studies at therapeutic doses.

methodsWe characterized the effect of DFMO on cell viability, cell cycle, apoptosis, neurosphere formation, and protein expression in vitro using five established neuroblastoma cell lines (BE2C, CHLA-90, SHSY5Y, SMS-KCNR, and NGP) at clinically relevant doses of 0, 50, 100, 500, 1000, and 2500 μM. Limiting Dilution studies of tumor formation in murine models were performed. Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad and the level of significance set at p = 0.05.

resultsThere was not a significant loss of cell viability or gain of apoptotic activity in the in vitro assays (p > 0.05). DFMO treatment initiated G1 to S phase cell cycle arrest. There was a dose-dependent decrease in frequency and size of neurospheres and a dose-dependent increase in beta-galactosidase activity in all cell lines. Tumor formation was decreased in xenografts both with DFMO-pretreated cells and in mice treated with DFMO.

conclusionDFMO treatment is cytostatic at physiologically relevant doses and inhibits tumor initiation and progression in mice. This study suggests that DFMO, inhibits neuroblastoma by targeting cellular processes integral to neuroblastoma tumorigenesis at clinically relevant doses.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell SurvivalEflornithineNeuroblastomaXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinogenesisCell CycleCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationFemaleHumansMiceAntineoplastic AgentsEflornithinecell cycleDFMOELDAneuroblastomaneurospheresenescencexenograft

Identifiers

PMID38686627
PMCPMC11058673
OpenAlexW4396533959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.