ArticleLa Medicina del lavoro2024
Regulatory and Ethical Considerations on Artificial Intelligence for Occupational Medicine.
Article in La Medicina del lavoro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Occupational Health: Global Umbrella Review of Applications and Limitations.Safety and health at work · 2026Review
- Machine learning in the analysis of mental health at work: a scoping review.Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
- AI-driven healthcare: a trend toward better healthcare or the emergence of public health burden.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Application of large language models as decision support tools in occupational health and safety management: a cohort study of industrial workers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Large language models in clinical trials: applications, technical advances, and future directions.BMC medicine · 2025Review
- ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot for Cochlear Implant Side Selection: A Preliminary Study.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Assessment of artificial intelligence performance in answering questions on onabotulinum toxin and sacral neuromodulation.Investigative and clinical urology · 2025Article
- Exploring Human-AI Dynamics in Enhancing Workplace Health and Safety: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Ethical and Legal Governance of Generative AI in Chinese Healthcare.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence and Large Language Models are reshaping labor dynamics and occupational health practices. As AI continues to evolve, there's a critical need to customize ethical considerations for its specific impacts on occupational health. Recognizing potential ethical challenges and dilemmas, stakeholders and physicians are urged to proactively adjust the practice of occupational medicine in response to shifting ethical paradigms. By advocating for a comprehensive review of the International Commission on Occupational Health ICOH code of Ethics, we can ensure responsible medical AI deployment, safeguarding the well-being of workers amidst the transformative effects of automation in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.