Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38686529›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2024

The construct validity and internal consistency of QuickDASH in pediatric patients with upper extremity fractures.

Niko Kämppä, Sina Hulkkonen, Petra Grahn, Topi Laaksonen, Jussi Repo

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niko KämppäDepartment of Hand Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsink. niko.kamppa@helsinki.fi.
Sina HulkkonenDepartment of Hand Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki.
Petra GrahnDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, New Children's Hospital, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki.
Topi LaaksonenDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics and Traumatology, New Children's Hospital, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki.
Jussi RepoUnit of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FITampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeInvestigation of treatment options in the pediatric population necessitates the use of valid patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). We aimed to assess the construct validity and internal consistency of the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) in the pediatric population with upper extremity fractures treated both operatively and conservatively. PATIENTS AND

methodsQuickDASH, along with several reference PROMs and objective outcome measures, was obtained from 148 5- to 18-year-old patients with a humeral medial epicondyle fracture or a fracture of the distal forearm in a cross-sectional setting with a single follow-up visit. Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression models were used to assess convergent validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to assess structural validity, and Cronbach's alpha to investigate internal consistency.

resultsThe direction and magnitude of correlation showed by QuickDASH with reference outcome measures was consistent and demonstrated good convergent validity. EFA indicated a 3-factor model with poor fit indices and structural validity remained questionable. Construct validity was considered acceptable overall. QuickDASH demonstrated good internal consistency with an acceptable Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.75).

conclusionQuickDASH demonstrated acceptable construct validity and good internal consistency and is thus a valid instrument, with some limitations, to assess disability and quality of life in pediatric patients with upper extremity fractures.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationHumeral FracturesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleForearm InjuriesHumansMaleRadius FracturesReproducibility of ResultsUlna Fractures

Identifiers

PMID38686529
PMCPMC11058482
OpenAlexW4396513994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.