ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Development of automated neural network prediction for echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smarter FoCUS: AI-guided focused cardiac ultrasound enables novice detection of left ventricular dysfunction.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Point-of-Care Transesophageal Echocardiography in Emergency and Intensive Care: An Evolving Imaging Modality.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Stroke in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: An Autopsy-Based Study of Mechanisms, Topography, and Clinical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Anemia in Heart Failure: Diagnostic Insights and Management Patterns Across Ejection Fraction Phenotypes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Molecular Diagnostics in Heart Failure: From Biomarkers to Personalized Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Automated ejection fraction and risk stratification in cardiomyopathy patients with diverse LV geometry using 2D echocardiography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Self-Supervised Multi-Task Learning for the Detection and Classification of RHD-Induced Valvular Pathology.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Interoception, cardiac health, and heart failure: The potential for artificial intelligence (AI)-driven diagnosis and treatment.Physiological reports · 2025Review
- Segmentation-Free Estimation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Using 3D CNN Is Reliable and Improves as Multiple Cardiac MRI Cine Orientations Are Combined.Biomedicines · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is fundamental to the diagnosis and classification of patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: This paper aimed to quantify LVEF automatically and accurately with the proposed pipeline method based on deep neural networks and ensemble learning. Within the pipeline, an Atrous Convolutional Neural Network (ACNN) was first trained to segment the left ventricle (LV), before employing the area-length formulation based on the ellipsoid single-plane model to calculate LVEF values. This formulation required inputs of LV area, derived from segmentation using an improved Jeffrey's method, as well as LV length, derived from a novel ensemble learning model. To further improve the pipeline's accuracy, an automated peak detection algorithm was used to identify end-diastolic and end-systolic frames, avoiding issues with human error. Subsequently, single-beat LVEF values were averaged across all cardiac cycles to obtain the final LVEF. Results: This method was developed and internally validated in an open-source dataset containing 10,030 echocardiograms. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.83 for LVEF prediction compared to expert human analysis ( Conclusion: The automated neural network-based calculation of LVEF is comparable to expert clinicians performing time-consuming, frame-by-frame manual evaluations of cardiac systolic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.