ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Effect of the prism and Maddox rod test as the surgical target for type III acute acquired comitant esotropia.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of surgical outcomes and intervention threshold for small-angle acute acquired comitant esotropia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Surgical outcomes of bilateral medial rectus recession in cases of acute acquired comitant esotropia.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to explore more accurate and efficient examination methods to provide precise target surgical measurements for patients with type III acute acquired comitant esotropia (AACE). Methods: The study conducted a retrospective analysis of 108 patients diagnosed with AACE who received surgical treatment at the Department of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, from January 2018 to September 2023. All patients underwent examinations of the deviation angle, including the Hirschberg test, prism and Maddox rod test (PMT), and prism and alternate cover test (PACT). For the PACT, the minimum value (PACTmin) and maximum value (PACTmax) were obtained based on differences in examination methods, as well as the deviation angle range (PACT range), which represents the difference between PACTmax and PACTmin. Postoperatively, these patients were followed up for at least 6 months to assess changes in eye position and whether diplopia symptoms recurred. Results: In both near and distant examinations, the results of PACTmax were significantly greater than those of PACTmin ( Conclusion: The PMT can provide precise target surgical measurements for type III AACE, making it a fast, effective, and cost-efficient examination method. It is worthy of being promoted and applied in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.