Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38686338›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2024

Oral Delivery of Photopolymerizable Nanogels Loaded with Gemcitabine for Pancreatic Cancer Therapy: Formulation Design, and in vitro and in vivo Evaluations.

Adi Yugatama, Ya-Lin Huang, Ming-Jen Hsu, Jia-Pei Lin, Fang-Ching Chao, Jenny K W Lam, Chien-Ming Hsieh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adi Yugatama *School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.
Ya-Lin Huang *School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.
Ming-Jen HsuDepartment of Pharmacology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.
Jia-Pei LinSchool of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.
Fang-Ching ChaoCNRS UMR 8612, Institut Galien Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, 91400, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8027-8341
Jenny K W LamDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University College, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Chien-Ming HsiehSchool of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7204-4681

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) faces challenges of poor oral bioavailability and extensive first-pass metabolism. Currently, only injectable formulations are available for clinical use. Hence, there is an urgent demand for the development of advanced, efficacious, and user-friendly dosage forms to maintain its status as the primary treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Nanogels (NGs) offer a novel oral drug delivery system, ideal for hydrophilic compounds like GEM. This study aims to develop NGs tailored for GEM delivery, with the goal of enhancing cellular uptake and gastrointestinal permeability for improved administration in PDAC patients. Methods: We developed cross-linked NGs via photopolymerization of methacryloyl for drug delivery of GEM. We reveal characterization, cytotoxicity, and cellular uptake studies in Caco-2 and MIA PaCa-2 cells. In addition, studies of in vitro permeability and pharmacokinetics were carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of the drug. Results: Our results show NGs, formed via photopolymerization of methacryloyl, had a spherical shape with a size of 233.91±7.75 nm. Gemcitabine-loaded NGs (NGs-GEM) with 5% GelMA exhibited efficient drug loading (particle size: 244.07±19.52 nm). In vitro drug release from NGs-GEM was slower at pH 1.2 than pH 6.8. Cellular uptake studies indicated significantly enhanced uptake in both MIA PaCa-2 and Caco-2 cells. While there was no significant difference in GEM's AUC and Cmax between NGs-GEM and free-GEM groups, NGs-GEM showed markedly lower dFdU content (10.07 hr∙μg/mL) compared to oral free-GEM (19.04 hr∙μg/mL) after oral administration (p<0.01), highlighting NGs' efficacy in impeding rapid drug metabolism and enhancing retention. Conclusion: In summary, NGs enhance cellular uptake, inhibit rapid metabolic degradation of GEM, and prolong retention after oral administration. These findings suggest NGs-GEM as a promising candidate for clinical use in oral pancreatic cancer therapy.

Indexed as

DeoxycytidineGemcitabinePancreatic NeoplasmsAdministration, OralAnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiological AvailabilityCaco-2 CellsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell Line, TumorDrug CarriersDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanogelsParticle SizePolymerizationAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDeoxycytidineDrug CarriersGemcitabineNanogelsgemcitabinenanogeloral deliverypancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID38686338
PMCPMC11057685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.