ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2024
A review of the applications of generative adversarial networks to structural and functional MRI based diagnostic classification of brain disorders.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- WGTMM: WGAN with Transformer Feature Matching for Generating fMRI Data in MCI Patients.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Construction of a small-sample brain imaging data augmentation and explainable diagnostic model for autism based on generative adversarial networks.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- The Deep Learning Revolution in Neuroimaging: Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis (2014-2024).Neuroinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural and functional MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) based diagnostic classification using machine learning has long held promise, but there are many roadblocks to achieving their potential. While traditional machine learning models suffered from their inability to capture the complex non-linear mapping, deep learning models tend to overfit the model. This is because there is data scarcity and imbalanced classes in neuroimaging; it is expensive to acquire data from human subjects and even more so in clinical populations. Due to their ability to augment data by learning underlying distributions, generative adversarial networks (GAN) provide a potential solution to this problem. Here, we provide a methodological primer on GANs and review the applications of GANs to classification of mental health disorders from neuroimaging data such as functional MRI and showcase the progress made thus far. We also highlight gaps in methodology as well as interpretability that are yet to be addressed. This provides directions about how the field can move forward. We suggest that since there are a range of methodological choices available to users, it is critical for users to interact with method developers so that the latter can tailor their development according to the users' needs. The field can be enriched by such synthesis between method developers and users in neuroimaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.