ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
The clinical value of iodine-125 seed implantation in the treatment of iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06362772 (The Clinical Value of Iodine-125 Seed Implantation in the Treatment of Iodine-refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Clinical Value of Iodine-125 Seed Implantation in the Treatment of Iodine-refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes and Individualized Seed Implantation Planning for Iodine-125 Seeds Brachytherapy in Lymph Node Metastases.Journal of Cancer · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of 125I seed implantation combined with thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression therapy in cervical lymph node metastases of differentiated thyroid carcinoma.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Current perspectives and emerging trends in iodine-125 seed implantation: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Effects of Trace Elements on Endocrine Function and Pathogenesis of Thyroid Diseases-A Literature Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined withFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical benefits of Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 36 patients with RAIR-DTC who underwent radioactive Results: Tumor size was significantly reduced after treatment (all P < 0.001): tumor length diameters were 32.67 (17.70, 45.72) mm, 27.45 (12.30, 39.98) mm, 20.70 (11.98, 37.58) mm, and 20.39 (10.56, 33.20) mm in the preoperative, 1-, 3-, and 5-months postoperative periods, respectively. Additionally, two consecutive post-treatment results were more minor and statistically significant than the previous results (P < 0.001). The LER at 1-, 3-, and 5-months post-surgery was 23.73%, 38.98%, and 52.54%, respectively, while the LCR at the same time points was 98.31%, 96.61%, and 94.92%, respectively. Patients' serum Tg levels decreased significantly after surgery. (P < 0.001). Serum Tg levels were measured before surgery and 1-, 3-, and 5-months post-surgery. The results showed that serum Tg levels were 249.45 (79.39, 4718.75) ng/ml, 193.40 (44.53, 2829.00) ng/ml, 192.10 (25.58, 1758.00) ng/ml, and 136.25 (16.57, 1553.25) ng/ml, respectively. Two consecutive post-treatment results were more minor and statistically significant than the previous results (P < 0.001). The patients' pain symptoms were significantly relieved after Conclusion: Most lesions treated with Clinical trial registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT06362772.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.