Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38686157›Full record

ReviewMedical science educator2024

Test Anxiety Among US Medical Students: A Review of the Current Literature.

Clark Williamson, Sarah T Wright, Gary L Beck Dallaghan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clark WilliamsonUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4702-9567
Sarah T WrightUNC Health Sciences Library, Chapel Hill, NC USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2076-8343
Gary L Beck DallaghanDepartment of Medical Education, The University of Texas at Tyler School of Medicine, 11937 US Hwy 271, Tyler, TX 75708 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8539-6969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Medical students experience anxiety at higher rates than the general public and many are uniquely affected by additional test anxiety throughout their medical education. Although test anxiety has been studied for decades, little evidence has been published suggesting interventions improve examination performance in medical education. Therefore, we set out to review the current literature to elucidate efforts so far and establish trends in research. Methods: Databases searched included PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, ERIC, SCOPUS, and CINAHL. English language articles published between 2010 and 2021 were loaded into a reference manager to screen out duplicate articles. During the full-text screen and data extraction phase, reference lists were also inspected to identify additional articles for inclusion in the study. Results: Of 883 studies identified, 860 were excluded resulting in 22 studies for extraction and analysis. First-year ( Conclusion: This review identifies a variety of measurement tools and interventions attempting to mitigate test anxiety. As far as improving examination performance, none of the interventions reported was successful. Further research addressing test anxiety that results in improved medical student academic performance should be conducted and also use established assessment tools.

Indexed as

ExaminationsLiterature reviewMedical studentsTest anxiety

Identifiers

PMID38686157
PMCPMC11055846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.