ArticleMedical science educator2024
Transitioning from Faculty-Written Examinations to National Board of Medical Examiners Custom Examinations in Medical Education.
Article in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: A challenge for medical educators is choosing a method that best evaluates preclinical students' performance in preparation for Step 1. In previous years, block directors (BDs) of the 2nd year (MS2) neuroscience course at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine issued faculty-written (FW) examinations during the course. In 2022, BDs replaced FW examinations with National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) custom examinations. The rationale being that the customized NBME exams would better reflect the national neuroscience curriculum and enhance student preparedness for taking standardized exams. Methods: FW examinations (2021) were created by the faculty in the neuroscience course and reviewed by BDs. In contrast, questions that best aligned with the material covered for the 2022 course were selected by BDs using MyNBME Results: Participants reported greater satisfaction in their neuroscience education and block organization with NBME examinations. For example, there was a nearly twofold (1.83) increase in the number of students that strongly agreed with the statement "Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of my neuroscience education in this block." They were also less likely to report the workload as being "much too heavy." Overall, students expressed a preference for the customized NBME exams as opposed to faculty generated exams (88.1%). Conclusions: From the student perspective, building customized assessments through MyNBME
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.