Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38686011›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

A comparison of deep transfer learning backbone architecture techniques for printed text detection of different font styles from unstructured documents.

Supriya Mahadevkar, Shruti Patil, Ketan Kotecha, Ajith Abraham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Supriya MahadevkarSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
Shruti PatilSymbiosis Centre for Applied Artificial Intelligence, Symbiosis Institute of Technology Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ketan KotechaSymbiosis Centre for Applied Artificial Intelligence, Symbiosis Institute of Technology Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Ajith AbrahamSchool of Computer Science Engineering & Technology, Bennett University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Object detection methods based on deep learning have been used in a variety of sectors including banking, healthcare, e-governance, and academia. In recent years, there has been a lot of attention paid to research endeavors made towards text detection and recognition from different scenesor images of unstructured document processing. The article's novelty lies in the detailed discussion and implementation of the various transfer learning-based different backbone architectures for printed text recognition. In this research article, the authors compared the ResNet50, ResNet50V2, ResNet152V2, Inception, Xception, and VGG19 backbone architectures with preprocessing techniques as data resizing, normalization, and noise removal on a standard OCR Kaggle dataset. Further, the top three backbone architectures selected based on the accuracy achieved and then hyper parameter tunning has been performed to achieve more accurate results. Xception performed well compared with the ResNet, Inception, VGG19, MobileNet architectures by achieving high evaluation scores with accuracy (98.90%) and min loss (0.19). As per existing research in this domain, until now, transfer learning-based backbone architectures that have been used on printed or handwritten data recognition are not well represented in literature. We split the total dataset into 80 percent for training and 20 percent for testing purpose and then into different backbone architecture models with the same number of epochs, and found that the Xception architecture achieved higher accuracy than the others. In addition, the ResNet50V2 model gave us higher accuracy (96.92%) than the ResNet152V2 model (96.34%).

Indexed as

Backbone architecturesInceptionObject detectionObject recognitionOCR (Object Character Recognition)Printed text recognitionResNet50V2Transfer learningVGG19Xception

Identifiers

PMID38686011
PMCPMC11057569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.