Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38685588›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

The (in)visibility of deafness: Identity, stigma, quality of life and the potential role of totally implantable cochlear implants.

Chi Yhun Lo, Robyn Clay-Williams, Beth Elks, Chris Warren, Frances Rapport

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The (in)visibility of deafness: Identity, stigma, quality of life and the potential role of totally implantable cochlear implants.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chi Yhun LoFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7695-3148
Robyn Clay-WilliamsFaculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Beth ElksCochlear Limited, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Chris WarrenCochlear Limited, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Frances RapportCochlear Limited, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Cochlear (Australia) · AUAustralian Hearing · AU

Funding

Cochlear ID167333389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe disclosure of deafness is complex, given the historic and on-going stigma associated with being deaf. The aim of this study was to explore how identity, stigma, and quality of life may be impacted when using cochlear implants (CIs) and totally implantable cochlear implants (TICIs). The physical difference between these two assistive listening devices is significant, given many CI users opt to hide their sound processor behind hair or headwear, in contrast to TICIs (an emerging technology) whereby all components are implanted internally and thus invisible.

methodsThis qualitative study involved semistructured interviews and demographic questionnaires with 12 adult participants with more than 1 year of experience using their CI. Participants were recruited Australia-wide through community organisations that support deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically, with the themes generated through an inductive process, with consensus generated through group working with three members from the research team.

resultsFour major themes were identified: (1) CI challenges; (2) The importance of social and support networks; (3) Identity and disclosure and (4) Concerns about TICIs. The underlying finding was centred around the construction of deaf identity. Participant attitudes were generally categorised as 'Loud and proud', with the recognition that displaying the CI was an extension of self, something to be proud of, and a means to normalise deafness; or 'Out of sight and out of mind', which sought to minimise the visibility of deafness. While both identities differed in how deafness is disclosed, they are fundamentally related to the same ideas of self-agency and empowerment.

conclusionTICIs present a novel opportunity-the ability for CI users to control the visibility of their deafness and thus control disclosure. This study explored the impact of stigma and categorised two core identities that CI users construct. Future directions include investigating potential CI candidates, to explore if TICIs may be a facilitator to CI uptake. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The semistructured interview guide was developed in consultation with adults with CIs. Feedback led to adjustments and improvement to the interview guide. In addition, F. R. has a lived experience with hearing loss, and C. Y. L. is an executive committee member for a nonprofit charity organisation that supports families that are D/deaf and hard-of-hearing.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsDeafnessQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSocial StigmaAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescochlear implantsdisclosureidentityquality of lifestigmatotally implantable cochlear implants

Identifiers

PMID38685588
PMCPMC11058281
OpenAlexW4396517681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.