Trial reportClinical and translational medicine2024
Comprehensive multi-omics analysis of resectable locally advanced gastric cancer: Assessing response to neoadjuvant camrelizumab and chemotherapy in a single-center, open-label, single-arm phase II trial.
Trial report in Clinical and translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy-based neoadjuvant regimens in locally advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis based on high-quality clinical trials.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy plus thymalfasin in locally advanced gastric cancer: a prospective clinical trial.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- Phase II study of perioperative camrelizumab and XELOX for locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.Cancer science · 2025Trial
- Pathologic Response of Phase III Study: Perioperative Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib and Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (DRAGON IV/CAP 05).Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Comprehensive multi-omics analysis of resectable locally advanced gastric cancer: Assessing response to neoadjuvant camrelizumab and chemotherapy in a single-center, open-label, single-arm phase II trial.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024Trial
- Molecular classification and precision therapy in gastric cancer: Current advances and future perspectives (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Transforming perioperative treatment of gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma: triumphs, setbacks and future horizons.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Impact of total gastrectomy plus perioperative PD-1 inhibitors on survival in locally advanced gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Spatial immune niches in gastric cancer immunotherapy resistance: mechanisms and translational implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Perioperative PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer with PAN metastasis undergoing D2 gastrectomy and PAND: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Timing of postoperative chemotherapy and prognosis in neoadjuvant-treated gastric cancer patients: a multicenter real-world cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical advances and challenges of anti-angiogenic targeted therapy in gastric cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Predictive biomarkers in the era of immunotherapy for gastric cancer: current achievements and future perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe current standard of care for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery. Recently, neoadjuvant treatment for this condition has involved the exploration of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy as a potential approach. However, the efficacy remains uncertain.
methodsA single-arm, phase 2 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with mFOLFOX6 and identify potential biomarkers of response through multi-omics analysis in patients with resectable locally advanced GC. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints included the R0 rate, near pCR rate, progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Multi-omics analysis was assessed by whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing, and multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) using biopsies pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy.
resultsThis study involved 60 patients, of which 55 underwent gastrectomy. Among these, five (9.1%) attained a pathological complete response (pCR), and 11 (20.0%) reached near pCR. No unexpected treatment-emergent adverse events or perioperative mortality were observed, and the regimen presented a manageable safety profile. Molecular changes identified through multi-omics analysis correlated with treatment response, highlighting associations between HER2-positive and CTNNB1 mutations with treatment sensitivity and a favourable prognosis. This finding was further supported by immune cell infiltration analysis and mIF. Expression data uncovered a risk model with four genes (RALYL, SCGN, CCKBR, NTS) linked to poor response. Additionally, post-treatment infiltration of CD8+ T lymphocytes positively correlates with pathological response.
conclusionThe findings suggest the combination of PD-1-inhibitor and mFOLFOX6 showed efficacy and acceptable toxicity for locally advanced GC. Extended follow-up is required to determine the duration of the response. This study lays essential groundwork for developing precise neoadjuvant regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.