ArticleBMC nursing2024
Nurse rostering: understanding the current shift work scheduling processes, benefits, limitations, and potential fatigue risks.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Goal Programming Model for Nurse Shift Scheduling Incorporating Flexible Constraints: A Case Study in an Operating Room Department.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Informal Digital Coordination of Nurse Shift Swaps in a Saudi Tertiary Hospital: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing hospital workforce planning, scheduling, and performance evaluation through an AI-driven human resource management system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Promoting Sustainable Work Hours Through Participatory Scheduling: A Cross-Sectional Study Employing Objective Working Time Data.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review of the Key Drivers That Impact Early-Career Nurses' Thriving at Work, Intention to Stay in Employment, and Nursing Profession.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Incidence and risk factors for nursing-related intraoperative incidents: A 5-year retrospective study at a Japanese tertiary care hospital.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2025Observational
- Guidelines for Reducing the Adverse Effects of Shift Work on Nursing Staff: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- "I don't think there's necessarily a one size fits all" negotiating competing priorities in nurse shift scheduling: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Developing nurse and midwife centred rostering principles using co-design: a mixed-methods study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Risk Factors Associated with Psychological Health and Workload among Clinical Nurses.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImplementing appropriate shift work schedules can help mitigate the risk of sleep impairment and reduce fatigue of healthcare workers, reducing occupational health and safety risks. In Australia, the organisation has a responsibility to make sure all reasonable measures are taken to reduce fatigue of staff. Therefore, it is important to assess what the current rostering processes is for staff responsible for creating the rosters for nurses.
aimThe aims of the project were to understand (1) who creates the rosters and what the process is, (2) what training and knowledge these staff have in establishing rostering schedules that optimise the sleep and wellbeing of staff, and (3) what the benefits and limitations are of current rostering practices.
methodsFindings were generated through semi-structured interviews, using cluster coding to form categories. Twenty four nurses responsible for rostering staff were interviewed from three different sites in Victoria (one metropolitan and two regional/rural hospitals). Data was analysed using selected grounded theory methods with thematic analysis.
resultsThe common themes that came out of the interviews were that rostering staff were under prepared, unaware of fatigue and safety guidelines and polices from governing bodies and had not received any education or training before taking on the role. The most common rostering style was self-rostering, where staff could submit preferences. However, there were concerns about staff fatigue but were divided as to who should be responsible, with many saying it was up to staff to preference shifts that they could cope with. The final theme was cultural barriers to change.
conclusionWhile self-rostering resulted in staff having more freedom and flexibility, shift preferences may be influenced more so by a need to fit with lifestyle rather than to minimise fatigue and increase safety in the workplace. Greater consideration of the impact of shift work schedules on fatigue is required to ensure that the layers of clinical governance in health care organisations minimise the risk of occupation health and safety issues for employees delivering direct patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.