Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38685019›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Nurse rostering: understanding the current shift work scheduling processes, benefits, limitations, and potential fatigue risks.

Lauren A Booker, Jane Mills, Melanie Bish, Jo Spong, Melissa Deacon-Crouch, Timothy C Skinner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren A BookerSchool of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia. l.booker@latrobe.edu.au.
Jane MillsDepartment of Rural Health Sciences, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia.
Melanie BishDepartment of Rural Health Sciences, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia.
Jo SpongDepartment of Rural Health Sciences, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia.
Melissa Deacon-CrouchDepartment of Rural Health Sciences, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia.
Timothy C SkinnerSchool of Psychology & Public Health, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementing appropriate shift work schedules can help mitigate the risk of sleep impairment and reduce fatigue of healthcare workers, reducing occupational health and safety risks. In Australia, the organisation has a responsibility to make sure all reasonable measures are taken to reduce fatigue of staff. Therefore, it is important to assess what the current rostering processes is for staff responsible for creating the rosters for nurses.

aimThe aims of the project were to understand (1) who creates the rosters and what the process is, (2) what training and knowledge these staff have in establishing rostering schedules that optimise the sleep and wellbeing of staff, and (3) what the benefits and limitations are of current rostering practices.

methodsFindings were generated through semi-structured interviews, using cluster coding to form categories. Twenty four nurses responsible for rostering staff were interviewed from three different sites in Victoria (one metropolitan and two regional/rural hospitals). Data was analysed using selected grounded theory methods with thematic analysis.

resultsThe common themes that came out of the interviews were that rostering staff were under prepared, unaware of fatigue and safety guidelines and polices from governing bodies and had not received any education or training before taking on the role. The most common rostering style was self-rostering, where staff could submit preferences. However, there were concerns about staff fatigue but were divided as to who should be responsible, with many saying it was up to staff to preference shifts that they could cope with. The final theme was cultural barriers to change.

conclusionWhile self-rostering resulted in staff having more freedom and flexibility,  shift preferences may be influenced more so by a need to fit with lifestyle rather than to minimise fatigue and increase safety in the workplace. Greater consideration of the impact of shift work schedules on fatigue is required to ensure that the layers of clinical governance in health care organisations minimise the risk of occupation health and safety issues for employees delivering direct patient care.

Indexed as

FatigueHealthcare workforceNursesOccupational health and safetyShift workSleep

Identifiers

PMID38685019
PMCPMC11057102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.