Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684991›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2024

Was it a HIIT? A process evaluation of a school-based high-intensity interval training intervention.

Stephanie L Duncombe, Alan R Barker, Lisa Price, Jacqueline L Walker, Jodie L Koep, James Woodforde, Michalis Stylianou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie L DuncombeSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. s.duncombe@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0673-6409
Alan R BarkerChildren's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Public Health and Sports Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Lisa PriceChildren's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Public Health and Sports Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jacqueline L WalkerSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Jodie L KoepSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
James WoodfordeSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Michalis StylianouSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a growing body of research investigating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in schools, there are limited process evaluations investigating their implementation. This is concerning because process evaluations are important for appropriately interpreting outcome findings and augmenting intervention design. This manuscript presents a process evaluation of Making a HIIT, a school-based HIIT intervention.

methodsThe Making a HIIT intervention spanned 8 weeks and was completed at three schools in Greater Brisbane, Australia. Ten classes (intervention group) completed 10-min teacher-led HIIT workouts at the beginning of health and physical education (HPE) lessons, and five classes (control group) continued with regular HPE lessons. The mixed methods evaluation was guided by the Framework for Effective Implementation by Durlak and DuPre.

resultsProgram reach: Ten schools were contacted to successfully recruit three schools, from which 79% of eligible students (n = 308,

conclusionThe comprehensive evaluation of Making a HIIT provides important insights into the implementation of school-based HIIT, including encouragings findings for student enjoyment and fidelity and recommendations for improving dosage that should be considered when developing future interventions.

trial registrationACTRN, ACTRN12622000534785 , Registered 5 April 2022 - Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Heart RateHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingPhysical Education and TrainingSchoolsStudentsAdolescentAustraliaFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesChildEnjoymentFidelityImplementationPhysical education

Identifiers

PMID38684991
PMCPMC11059682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.