Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684990›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2024

Untangling the mess of CGRP levels as a migraine biomarker: an in-depth literature review and analysis of our experimental experience.

Gabriel Gárate, Julio Pascual, Marta Pascual-Mato, Jorge Madera, María Muñoz-San Martín, Vicente González-Quintanilla

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriel GárateInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla & Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain. gabriel.garate@gmail.com.
Julio PascualInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla & Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Marta Pascual-MatoInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla & Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Jorge MaderaInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla & Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
María Muñoz-San MartínInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla & Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Vicente González-QuintanillaInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla & Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/01358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is the most promising candidate to become the first migraine biomarker. However, literature shows clashing results and suggests a methodological source for such discrepancies. We aimed to investigate some of these methodological factors to evaluate the actual role of CGRP as biomarker.

methodsPrevious to the experimental part, we performed a literature review of articles measuring CGRP in migraine patients. Using our 399 bio-bank sera samples, we performed a series of experiments to test the validity of different ELISA kits employed, time of sample processing, long-term storage, sampling in rest or after moderate exercise. Analysis of in-house data was performed to analyse average levels of the peptide and the effect of sex and age.

resultsLiterature review shows the high variability in terms of study design, determination methods, results and conclusions obtained by studies including CGRP determinations in migraine patients. CGRP measurements depends on the method and specific kit employed, also on the isoform detected, showing completely different ranges of concentrations. Alpha-CGRP and beta-CGRP had median with IQR levels of 37.5 (28.2-54.4) and 4.6 (2.4-6.4)pg/mL, respectively. CGRP content is preserved in serum within the 24 first hours when samples are stored at 4°C after clotting and immediate centrifugation. Storages at -80°C of more than 6 months result in a decrease in CGRP levels. Moderate exercise prior to blood extraction does not modulate the concentration of the peptide. Age positively correlates with beta-CGRP content and men have higher alpha-CGRP levels than women.

conclusionsWe present valuable information for CGRP measurements in serum. ELISA kit suitability should be tested prior to the experiments. Alpha and beta-CGRP levels should be analysed separately as they can show different behaviours even within the same condition. Samples can be processed in a 24-h window if they have been kept in 4°C and should not be stored for more than 6 months at -80°C before assayed. Patients do not need to rest before the blood extraction unless they have performed a high-endurance exercise. For comparative studies, sex and age should be accounted for as these parameters can impact CGRP concentrations.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideMigraine DisordersAdultEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCGRPELISAExerciseHalf-lifeMethodMigraineStorage

Identifiers

PMID38684990
PMCPMC11057141
OpenAlexW4396241424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.