Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684870›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2024

The role of the human hippocampus in decision-making under uncertainty.

Bahaaeddin Attaallah, Pierre Petitet, Rhea Zambellas, Sofia Toniolo, Maria Raquel Maio, Akke Ganse-Dumrath, Sarosh R Irani, Sanjay G Manohar, Masud Husain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Working Memory Deficits in Hippocampal Amnesia are Associated with Apathy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Neural Bases of Collective Social Behavior and Group Interactions across Species.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Active information sampling in health and disease.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bahaaeddin AttaallahNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Bahaaeddin.Attaallah@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7842-7974
Pierre PetitetDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-5326
Rhea ZambellasNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sofia TonioloNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Maria Raquel MaioNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Akke Ganse-DumrathNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4828-8117
Sarosh R IraniNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sanjay G ManoharNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0735-4349
Masud HusainNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6850-9255

Funding

Epilepsy Research UK (ERUK) P1201Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 104079/Z/14/Z]Wellcome Trust (Wellcome) 226645/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of the hippocampus in decision-making is beginning to be more understood. Because of its prospective and inferential functions, we hypothesized that it might be required specifically when decisions involve the evaluation of uncertain values. A group of individuals with autoimmune limbic encephalitis-a condition known to focally affect the hippocampus-were tested on how they evaluate reward against uncertainty compared to reward against another key attribute: physical effort. Across four experiments requiring participants to make trade-offs between reward, uncertainty and effort, patients with acute limbic encephalitis demonstrated blunted sensitivity to reward and effort whenever uncertainty was considered, despite demonstrating intact uncertainty sensitivity. By contrast, the valuation of these two attributes (reward and effort) was intact on uncertainty-free tasks. Reduced sensitivity to changes in reward under uncertainty correlated with the severity of hippocampal damage. Together, these findings provide evidence for a context-sensitive role of the hippocampus in value-based decision-making, apparent specifically under conditions of uncertainty.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHippocampusRewardAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID38684870
PMCPMC11272595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.