Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684868›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2024

Targeted protein degradation: from mechanisms to clinic.

Jonathan M Tsai, Radosław P Nowak, Benjamin L Ebert, Eric S Fischer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 203 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
203citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

203 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Recruiting without destroying.Nature chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Vepdegestrant: the first FDA-approved oral PROTAC and a milestone in targeted protein degradation.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

143 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan M Tsai *Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Radosław P Nowak *Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0605-0071
Benjamin L EbertDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Benjamin_Ebert@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0197-5451
Eric S FischerDepartment of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Eric_Fischer@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7337-6306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation refers to the use of small molecules to induce the selective degradation of proteins. In its most common form, this degradation is achieved through ligand-mediated neo-interactions between ubiquitin E3 ligases - the principal waste disposal machines of a cell - and the protein targets of interest, resulting in ubiquitylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation. Notable advances have been made in biological and mechanistic understanding of serendipitously discovered degraders. This improved understanding and novel chemistry has not only provided clinical proof of concept for targeted protein degradation but has also led to rapid growth of the field, with dozens of investigational drugs in active clinical trials. Two distinct classes of protein degradation therapeutics are being widely explored: bifunctional PROTACs and molecular glue degraders, both of which have their unique advantages and challenges. Here, we review the current landscape of targeted protein degradation approaches and how they have parallels in biological processes. We also outline the ongoing clinical exploration of novel degraders and provide some perspectives on the directions the field might take.

Indexed as

Proteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteolysisUbiquitinationUbiquitin-Protein LigasesAnimalsHumansProteinsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.