Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38684785›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Usability evaluation of a glove-type wearable device for efficient biometric collection during triage.

Masayoshi Shinozaki, Daiki Saito, Keisuke Tomita, Taka-Aki Nakada, Yukihiro Nomura, Toshiya Nakaguchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masayoshi ShinozakiDepartment of Medical Engineering, Center for Frontier Medical Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Chiba University, 1-33, Yayoicho, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan. masa12025726@gmail.com.
Daiki SaitoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan.
Keisuke TomitaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan.
Taka-Aki NakadaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 260-8677, Japan.
Yukihiro NomuraCenter for Frontier Medical Engineering, Chiba University, 1-33, Yayoicho, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan.
Toshiya NakaguchiCenter for Frontier Medical Engineering, Chiba University, 1-33, Yayoicho, Inage-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba, 263-8522, Japan.
Chiba University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP 22KJ0482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To efficiently allocate medical resources at disaster sites, medical workers perform triage to prioritize medical treatments based on the severity of the wounded or sick. In such instances, evaluators often assess the severity status of the wounded or sick quickly, but their measurements are qualitative and rely on experience. Therefore, we developed a wearable device called Medic Hand in this study to extend the functionality of a medical worker's hand so as to measure multiple biometric indicators simultaneously without increasing the number of medical devices to be carried. Medic Hand was developed to quantitatively and efficiently evaluate "perfusion" during triage. Speed is essential during triage at disaster sites, where time and effort are often spared to attach medical devices to patients, so the use of Medic Hand as a biometric measurement device is more efficient for collecting biometric information. For Medic Hand to be handy during disasters, it is essential to understand and improve upon factors that facilitate its public acceptance. To this end, this paper reports on the usability evaluation of Medic Hand through a questionnaire survey of nonmedical workers.

Indexed as

BiometryTriageWearable Electronic DevicesAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38684785
PMCPMC11059146
OpenAlexW4396498258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.